<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Litmus Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/10/08/litmus-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/10/08/litmus-tests/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VolsnCards5</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/10/08/litmus-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3241</link>
		<dc:creator>VolsnCards5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1107#comment-3241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[trading rasmus just to help for 2009 is extremely short sighted...if you can justify that trading him would help us over the next 4-5 years, then it should be considered...but trading an &quot;all-start type player&quot; just to help the 2009 cardinals is a mistake

basically, unless you can trade him for a tim lincecum type, then keep him(and play him!!!)

i&#039;m not sold on ludwick, he had a great year, but i&#039;m not sure it is sustainable...if he has a similar season next year, then consider signing him to a 3-year deal

i think ankiel should be traded this offseason(or at the trade deadline if we are not in contention, which i think we will be) for some pitching help/prospects...unless we know he is going to be a type A after next year, or know that he will reesign for a home team discount(remember, he is a boras client) Mo should really consider spinning him]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trading rasmus just to help for 2009 is extremely short sighted&#8230;if you can justify that trading him would help us over the next 4-5 years, then it should be considered&#8230;but trading an &#8220;all-start type player&#8221; just to help the 2009 cardinals is a mistake</p>
<p>basically, unless you can trade him for a tim lincecum type, then keep him(and play him!!!)</p>
<p>i&#8217;m not sold on ludwick, he had a great year, but i&#8217;m not sure it is sustainable&#8230;if he has a similar season next year, then consider signing him to a 3-year deal</p>
<p>i think ankiel should be traded this offseason(or at the trade deadline if we are not in contention, which i think we will be) for some pitching help/prospects&#8230;unless we know he is going to be a type A after next year, or know that he will reesign for a home team discount(remember, he is a boras client) Mo should really consider spinning him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigJawnMize</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/10/08/litmus-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator>BigJawnMize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1107#comment-3239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if the Rays win the World Series?  Heck even now their success versus their payroll helps justify the strategy that the team is using.  I promise you that if the Rays win the series we will hear interviews with Luhnow and Mo talking about how, &quot;They are a talented young team that will be together for years to come.  We are trying to incorprate more of there model.&quot;

I think a Rays win will make a difference in the argument.  

The other half of the coin is that Mo has to be active this year on the trade front.  We need to flip some outfield talent.  The type of players we get in return will be almost as telling as the players we trade.  If we pick up minor league or pre-arb players then the game plan would appear to stay in place.  If we are chasing vets then we will never be rid of LaRussa.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the Rays win the World Series?  Heck even now their success versus their payroll helps justify the strategy that the team is using.  I promise you that if the Rays win the series we will hear interviews with Luhnow and Mo talking about how, &#8220;They are a talented young team that will be together for years to come.  We are trying to incorprate more of there model.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think a Rays win will make a difference in the argument.  </p>
<p>The other half of the coin is that Mo has to be active this year on the trade front.  We need to flip some outfield talent.  The type of players we get in return will be almost as telling as the players we trade.  If we pick up minor league or pre-arb players then the game plan would appear to stay in place.  If we are chasing vets then we will never be rid of LaRussa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Farm Report 10/7/08 &#124; Future Redbirds</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/10/08/litmus-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3238</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Farm Report 10/7/08 &#124; Future Redbirds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1107#comment-3238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/10/08/litmus-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1107#comment-3237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article Azru,

I believe Colby will be an all star type player in the Majors but it probably would be better for the 2009 cardinals if he were traded for either a pitcher or a SS.  We need to sign Ankiel and Ludwick to three year deals and hang onto Schumaker and let him platoon with Mather.  Rasmus would be better served playing somewhere else if we need a few players because he is the only one who will get us an impact player in return.  If Rasmus stays he will spend the year in AAA so he won&#039;t help the 2009 team.  If we trade him we will get some help for the 2009 team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Azru,</p>
<p>I believe Colby will be an all star type player in the Majors but it probably would be better for the 2009 cardinals if he were traded for either a pitcher or a SS.  We need to sign Ankiel and Ludwick to three year deals and hang onto Schumaker and let him platoon with Mather.  Rasmus would be better served playing somewhere else if we need a few players because he is the only one who will get us an impact player in return.  If Rasmus stays he will spend the year in AAA so he won&#8217;t help the 2009 team.  If we trade him we will get some help for the 2009 team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobm</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/10/08/litmus-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>bobm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1107#comment-3236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I certainly hope that the Cards don&#039;t overreact to fan base reactions when making or not making trades involving prospect(s).  I am tired of hearing about the &quot;cheapness&quot; of Bill Dewitt when he continuously (at least to date) has fielded teams with a combined salary of $100 to $110 million.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly hope that the Cards don&#8217;t overreact to fan base reactions when making or not making trades involving prospect(s).  I am tired of hearing about the &#8220;cheapness&#8221; of Bill Dewitt when he continuously (at least to date) has fielded teams with a combined salary of $100 to $110 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
