<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raiding the Farm: Revisiting Peavy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:22:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theredbaaron</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4045</link>
		<dc:creator>theredbaaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4045</guid>
		<description>Shi- Look down at the very bottom of the page, in the blue margin area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shi- Look down at the very bottom of the page, in the blue margin area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siddfynch</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>siddfynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>AZ, a &quot;Herschel Walker&quot; package of that size gives me the creeps...

That said, I really doubt it would take all those guys.  If you built around Jones and added 2 players at need positions and one low-level, high-ceiling guy, it might do it.

Better yet, get a 3rd team involved.  I&#039;ve been chanting this for what seems like months now over on VEB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AZ, a &#8220;Herschel Walker&#8221; package of that size gives me the creeps&#8230;</p>
<p>That said, I really doubt it would take all those guys.  If you built around Jones and added 2 players at need positions and one low-level, high-ceiling guy, it might do it.</p>
<p>Better yet, get a 3rd team involved.  I&#8217;ve been chanting this for what seems like months now over on VEB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shi</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4042</link>
		<dc:creator>Shi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 02:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4042</guid>
		<description>This is random and not related to the topic, but I have a question.  Back on the old futureredbirds.com site, there was a neat and funny little black smiley face in the right margin, just an inch or so to the right of FR Crew.  Is there any way that a similar happy thing could be in the right margin of this site?  I know that it is extremely unimportant, but I liked the character it added to the old site, FWIW.  Thanks, and keep up the great work guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is random and not related to the topic, but I have a question.  Back on the old futureredbirds.com site, there was a neat and funny little black smiley face in the right margin, just an inch or so to the right of FR Crew.  Is there any way that a similar happy thing could be in the right margin of this site?  I know that it is extremely unimportant, but I liked the character it added to the old site, FWIW.  Thanks, and keep up the great work guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4040</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4040</guid>
		<description>Danny Haren was not regarded the same as Colby Rasmus---the centerpiece of any Peavy trade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny Haren was not regarded the same as Colby Rasmus&#8212;the centerpiece of any Peavy trade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azruavatar</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4039</link>
		<dc:creator>azruavatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4039</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hyperventilating prospect geeks can’t even cite Jaime Garcia and Mike Parisi&quot;

Let&#039;s be clear.  Strauss doesn&#039;t read up on the farm. He&#039;s not familiar with it nor does he want to take the time to invest in it.  That&#039;s fine.  It&#039;s not everyone&#039;s cup of tea.  But he certainly wasn&#039;t reading here because we never cited Garcia and certainly not Parisi as ready for big league starting duty.  The reason we &quot;prospect geeks&quot; can&#039;t cite anyone is because the Cardinals, as an organization, royally blow at developing starting pitching.

Garcia should still turn out to be a mid-rotation starter (perhaps better) but his timetable is moved backwards by a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hyperventilating prospect geeks can’t even cite Jaime Garcia and Mike Parisi&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be clear.  Strauss doesn&#8217;t read up on the farm. He&#8217;s not familiar with it nor does he want to take the time to invest in it.  That&#8217;s fine.  It&#8217;s not everyone&#8217;s cup of tea.  But he certainly wasn&#8217;t reading here because we never cited Garcia and certainly not Parisi as ready for big league starting duty.  The reason we &#8220;prospect geeks&#8221; can&#8217;t cite anyone is because the Cardinals, as an organization, royally blow at developing starting pitching.</p>
<p>Garcia should still turn out to be a mid-rotation starter (perhaps better) but his timetable is moved backwards by a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4038</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4038</guid>
		<description>If we didn&#039;t already have the Carpenter contract hanging around our necks, taking a shot at Peavy would be intriguing assuming he could be had for one guy off our ML roster like Schumaker and prospects not named Rasmus.  Walt handcuffed us.  Were maxed out on the injury risk starting pitcher credit cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we didn&#8217;t already have the Carpenter contract hanging around our necks, taking a shot at Peavy would be intriguing assuming he could be had for one guy off our ML roster like Schumaker and prospects not named Rasmus.  Walt handcuffed us.  Were maxed out on the injury risk starting pitcher credit cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cardinals645</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4037</link>
		<dc:creator>Cardinals645</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4037</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny that Strauss would put down, let&#039;s call it &quot;prospect appreciation&quot;, while talking about Mark Mulder. It seems to me that if we had kept those prospects (OK, mostly just Dan Haren) and never made that trade, we&#039;d have been a lot better off.
Carpenter, Wainwright, Haren? Yes, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that Strauss would put down, let&#8217;s call it &#8220;prospect appreciation&#8221;, while talking about Mark Mulder. It seems to me that if we had kept those prospects (OK, mostly just Dan Haren) and never made that trade, we&#8217;d have been a lot better off.<br />
Carpenter, Wainwright, Haren? Yes, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperSeve</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4036</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperSeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4036</guid>
		<description>Money are very important nowadays, so the padres cannot ask for too much return if they are not willing to eat some money. Schumaker+Boggs would already be more than enough for that salary dump. Being Mozielak, I would try to add Anderson and leave at least 3M$ of salary to the padres, this should be bearable due to pinero and glaus salaries off the book next year, the first replaced by Garcia and the second by Freese/Wallace.

GO CARDS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money are very important nowadays, so the padres cannot ask for too much return if they are not willing to eat some money. Schumaker+Boggs would already be more than enough for that salary dump. Being Mozielak, I would try to add Anderson and leave at least 3M$ of salary to the padres, this should be bearable due to pinero and glaus salaries off the book next year, the first replaced by Garcia and the second by Freese/Wallace.</p>
<p>GO CARDS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gforce</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>gforce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>i found this today and thought it was good. nothing new mind you but pretty cool that wallace is getting a lot of attention.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/waiting-for-wallace/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i found this today and thought it was good. nothing new mind you but pretty cool that wallace is getting a lot of attention.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/waiting-for-wallace/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/waiting-for-wallace/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cards13</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2008/12/05/raiding-farm-revisiting-peavy/comment-page-1/#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>cards13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=1654#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>Forget Peavy, go get Halladay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget Peavy, go get Halladay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

