The pocket-sized version of Allen Craig’s player profile is this: third baseman drafted out of college, has hit for good average and power at every stop and the only question mark is whether his defense is good enough at third base to play in the majors. Hmmm… that sounds familiar for some reason.

At a high level, comparisons to Brett Wallace do make a lot of sense. Both played in the Pac-10 (although Craig played all over the field during his college career, including LF, 1B, SS and 3B) and both are much more highly regarded for their bat than their glove. The superficial differences between the two are that Wallace bats lefthanded while Craig bats righthanded, Wallace weighs about 45 pounds more than Craig and Wallace is two years younger than Craig.

The consensus is that Brett Wallace is a future major leaguer and probably a well-above average offensive major leaguer. If Allen Craig is Wallace-lite (both literally and figuratively), what kind of value does Craig bring to the Cardinals organization?

Craig played High School ball in California (also like Brett Wallace) and then went to Cal, where he played for four years. In his four years at Cal he improved every season, capping off his college career with a .344/.403/.561 line his senior season which also included eleven home runs in 221 at bats. If you want to be picky, the only negative that you could point out is that he only walked in about 6% of his plate appearances, but it’s tough to quibble with a lack of walks when he was mashing everything thrown to him. Meanwhile he was striking out in about 10% of his plate appearances, which is an acceptable amount for a guy with his power profile.

Still, when it came time for the 2006 draft, Craig was not taken until the eighth round. He was listed as a shortstop when taken and Baseball America said at the time that he had “an injury-riddled career at California” and that he was “an offensive player without a defined position.” According to the Cal baseball website, he was injured in a collision at first base during his Freshman year of college and missed 17 games with an injury to his hand and wrist, but I couldn’t find any other mention of injuries and he seemed to play in almost all of Cal’s games during the rest of his career. Whatever the reason, whether injury concerns or positional concerns, the Cardinals appear to have gotten a steal in the eighth round.

In his professional debut, Craig’s numbers were down from the levels he set in college, but they were respectable nonetheless. In 48 games in the New York-Penn League he put up a line of .257/.325/.400 with four homeruns. The next season, however, he was back to his old self, tearing up pitching while playing for Palm Springs and putting up a line of .312/.370/.530 with 21 homeruns. Craig’s walk rate had improved since college, as well, taking the base on balls in 7.5% of his plate appearances (although he was striking out at a higher clip as well: 16.9% of the time). His performance earned him a seven game call up to Springfield at the end of the season and he made the most of it by hitting three homeruns.

Despite his offensive success in 2007, the Cardinals were unsure about Craig’s future. He had committed 18 errors at third base, which was cause for concern. That offseason, the Cardinals further complicated Craig’s future by trading Jim Edmonds to the Padres for prospect David Freese. Freese promptly jumped over Craig on the depth chart, skipping Springfield and starting 2008 in Memphis while Craig spent the year in Springfield.

Another complication that added to the backlog at the hot corner was that the Cardinals then went and drafted Wallace with their first round pick in June. Wallace was fast-tracked and was playing alongside Craig at Springfield by the end of the season.

But, in the face of seeming lack of faith in him, Craig continued to hit throughout 2008. He put up a .304/.374/.494 line with 22 homeruns in Springfield and increased his walk rate to 8.5%. According to the Baseball Prospectus, Craig’s peak translations (what he is likely to do in his peak years based on statistical extrapolation) is this: .284/.348/.472. The OPS of 820 that would represent would be 10th among third basemen at the major league level last season.

The question, of couse, has never really been about Craig’s bat, though. He followed up his 18 error performance in 2007 with 17 more in 2008. The Cardinals periodically played Craig in leftfield throughout the year and he did not make an error (or record an assist) in his 17 games patrolling the outfield. As an outfielder his OPS isn’t quite as impressive, as he would have been 40th in the league last season (although that still puts him in the top half of starting outfielders).

So, to answer the question posed above, the value Craig adds to the organization is a guy that projects to be a very solid major league bat – I’m thinking that Josh Willingham might be a good comp. Whether Craig becomes trade bait because of the backlog at third base or the Cardinals hold onto him and use him at third or left field, the Cardinals should receive a good return on their eighth round pick.

[Note: for more on Craig in his own words, check out Erik's great interview with him from earlier this year]

12 Responses to “Prospect Profile – Allen Craig”
  1. cariocacardinal says:

    I seem to remember one Texas League manager saying Craig was the best defensive 3rd baseman in the league. I think many people have written him off defensively too soon. Freese will probably get the nod at 3rd for Memphis next year only because his bat is closer due to already completing a year in AAA so he would be ready if Glauss went down. It will be interesting to compare Craig’s AAA numbers to Freese’s first year AAA numbers.

    ReplyReply
  2. Memphis25 says:

    cariocacardinal with only 7 other guys to beat its not saying a lot being the best in the league, Almost all the guys in the league were total butchers outside of Adam Fox and Craig.

    ReplyReply
  3. Swirls AEP9 says:

    Since Craig spent time at SS in college, and because Freese is too big for the position, do you think the front office has considered potentially moving Craig to 2B – similar to Jermaine Curtis?

    ReplyReply
  4. Sleeple55 says:

    +1
    Any thought of moving Craig to 2nd?

    ReplyReply
  5. theredbaaron says:

    Hey, everybody! Roarke’s back! Hey Roarke!

    What? I’m supposed to say something about the baseballing?

    Um, okay, how about this: I’m really surprised that we haven’t heard Craig’s name being tossed around a bit more here and there as part of potential trade packages. I think it’s pretty clear that he and Mr. Freeze are pretty similar players, but due to Freese’s stronger package defensively he has the edge over Craig. I look for Freese to grab a big league roster spot in ‘09 as the backup corner guy (a la Scott Spiezio), and Wallace is quickly moving into uber-prospectdom. Craig looks more and more to me like trade fodder. I suppose if one wanted to move him to left field on a more permanent basis, he might have the bat to get to the show, but then again, that would only toss him on to the pile of OF prospects the Cards already don’t have room for.

    And as for him playing somewhere in the middle of the diamond, it’s certainly not a bad thought, but having seen Craig play a few times at Springfield, I would have to say I don’t think it would work. He’s awfully big, and while he moves fairly well, I just dont’ think he has the nimbleness to play up the middle. Just one man’s opinion, though.

    ReplyReply
  6. burt says:

    Disclaimer: This is off topic and is a longwinded way to ask a question, but I think the background info helps.

    I don’t think the Cardinals need an experienced reliever as insurance for Perez / Motte. The front office appears to disagree; the organization been linked to numerous FA relievers and a few others that would be acquired via trade (Scott Downs and Ryan Madson come to mind but I doubt these rumors were accurate). One name I haven’t seen mentioned anywhere is Juan Cruz, a pretty terrific reliever. I don’t know what his salary demands are but he does have the awful stink of Type A status attached to him. He might as well have the Black Plague or Hepatitis (type) A.

    Hypothetically, let’s say Schumaker would net Downs or another reliever of his caliber (John Grabow, perhaps?). Is that preferable to signing Cruz and losing the draft pick? I think so. Schumaker is easily replaced w/in the system. What about Joe Mather? Again, I say yes (reluctantly). I don’t think I would trade Bryan Anderson or Daryl Jones, however. I think they both are currently worth more than a first-round pick.

    All of these hypotheticals and scenarios essentially brought me to one question: In your expert opinions, what Cardinal prospects or youngish players are worth more than a first-round draft pick?

    ReplyReply
  7. VolsnCards5 says:

    I too am shocked that Craig and Anderson have not at least been mentioned in rumors. I, for one, believe that if we don’t trade Craig this offseason, we need to move him to left field full time in AAA. Have Freese as the backup corner infielder in the majors, Wallace as the third baseman at AAA, and Craig as the LF. Maybe if you don’t think Wallace needs to start at AAA, you can put him at AA with Craig in AAA. But Craig has to get a full season’s worth of at bats in my opinion. He is to valuable at the plate.

    ReplyReply
  8. roarke says:

    Thanks, Baaron, good to be back.

    @Burt: that is an excellent question – well framed. I don’t have a great well-thought-out answer, but it is a great topic for discussion and one that will go well with our Prospect List(s) when those are complete. It would be an interesting exercise to draw a line in the list where every prospect above the line is worth more than a first round pick and every prospect below would be worth giving up if it meant we would keep our first round pick.

    ReplyReply
  9. I had the opportunity to see Craig play several times last summer along with having time to chat with him a few minutes before the Texas League Home Run Derby.

    Defensively, he has trouble with the balls that get up on him quickly. Interestingly, he moves really well laterally and plays those balls better than the ones hit right at him. His arm is average at best but playable. He is stuck at the corners because he does not have the athleticism to move to second.

    Dustin

    ReplyReply
  10. abe froman says:

    kind of off topic/kind of related to burt’s post.

    why is losing a first round draft pick seemingly something to be avoided at all costs?

    when you lose a first round pick, you gain something…cash. the cards would have an extra million or so to allocate to the rest of the draft if they lost their first round pick. they could pocket the money. i hope they wouldnt do that. i think their draft strategy would change a little bit, and the cards would pick 1 or 2 guys with strong college commitments that fall in the draft. if they throw some over slot cash at a few guys it would help ease the loss of the #1 pick, although it likely wouldnt replace it. there arent always people like this in the draft, but melville fell to the third or fourth round last year. it isnt exactly rare for late first round talent to fall a round or two lower. the cardinals could also take the whole bundle to latin america to see what they could buy. i dont think they can exactly replicate the lost first round talent, but they can certainly bring in some decent amateur talent with that first round pick money. that leads me to think people arent using the right equation to evaluate these scenarios. they seem to use:

    fuentes @ 3/$30 vs. 1st round pick and signing player X

    instead, i think they should be using:

    fuentes @ 3/$30 + latin american prospect(s) @ $1MM vs. first round pick and signing player X

    ReplyReply
  11. RunSup says:

    Another off topic:

    Any chance you can kill futureredbirds.com. That, or put a link there to this site.

    I’m just coming back into the world and noted with some disappointment that futureredbirds.com was frozen at July. I did not realize you had moved until VivaElBirdos pointed over here.

    ReplyReply
  12. erik says:

    There’s a big link right on the top post that .com has moved to .net

    ReplyReply
  13.  
Leave a Reply


Bad Behavior has blocked 2438 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Follow FR on Twitter