<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cariocacardinal</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12716</link>
		<dc:creator>cariocacardinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview on Sunday, Luhnow said that Craig would be in the starting lineup against Sacramento.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an interview on Sunday, Luhnow said that Craig would be in the starting lineup against Sacramento.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike cook</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12715</link>
		<dc:creator>mike cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Craig done for the season or will he be able to play this series?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Craig done for the season or will he be able to play this series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cariocacardinal</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12711</link>
		<dc:creator>cariocacardinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RRW - we could also debate whether you have used the term &quot;parse&quot; correctly but that might cause the thread to take another &quot;ironic&quot; twist! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RRW &#8211; we could also debate whether you have used the term &#8220;parse&#8221; correctly but that might cause the thread to take another &#8220;ironic&#8221; twist! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertoRydeWagner</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12707</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertoRydeWagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of the best threads ever at this web site.  We parse the azruvatar&#039;s use of &quot;irony.&quot;   Good job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the best threads ever at this web site.  We parse the azruvatar&#8217;s use of &#8220;irony.&#8221;   Good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StewartMiller</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12706</link>
		<dc:creator>StewartMiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has the PTBNL in the Duncan Lugo trade been named yet?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the PTBNL in the Duncan Lugo trade been named yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arch support</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12700</link>
		<dc:creator>arch support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look, when a robot operates under a questionable definition of irony, it certainly demands a conversation to settle the issue.

To me, this situation doesn&#039;t really smack of irony.  Curio?  Yes.  Tragedy?  Possibly.

But for this to be truly ironic, the Cardinals would have to face the A&#039;s in the World Series.  Wallace would have to be with the big club.  The Cards brass and press would have needed to spend the last week talking about how we didn&#039;t need Wallace, how Holliday was such an improvement, how not having Wallace will not cost us the Series, etc.  

In the bottom of the ninth in Game 7, with the Cards up by one run, Wallace comes to the plate with one on and two out.  Then, to really hit the irony button, instead of Franklin pitching to Wallace, Bud Selig stops play and commands that the World Series winner will be determined by a one-round bare-knuckle boxing match between Matt Holliday and Brett Wallace.

The pair step out to the dirt around home plate and commence the fight.  Wallace absolutely slaughters Holliday; two or three punches and Holliday is down for good.  The Series is over, an A&#039;s victory.  

After the game, the press hounds Holliday and Wallace for soundbytes.  Holliday pleads that he never had any boxing lessons; the A&#039;s organizational philosophy of non-violence prevented the team from ever offering violent combat training to its players.  Wallace, on the other hand, expresses his thanks to the Maker for his chance to come up through the Cardinals system, as he learned all his boxing technique from special sessions with Pop Warner during his days in Springfield.

That, my friends, would be irony.  The PCL playoffs?  Not so much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, when a robot operates under a questionable definition of irony, it certainly demands a conversation to settle the issue.</p>
<p>To me, this situation doesn&#8217;t really smack of irony.  Curio?  Yes.  Tragedy?  Possibly.</p>
<p>But for this to be truly ironic, the Cardinals would have to face the A&#8217;s in the World Series.  Wallace would have to be with the big club.  The Cards brass and press would have needed to spend the last week talking about how we didn&#8217;t need Wallace, how Holliday was such an improvement, how not having Wallace will not cost us the Series, etc.  </p>
<p>In the bottom of the ninth in Game 7, with the Cards up by one run, Wallace comes to the plate with one on and two out.  Then, to really hit the irony button, instead of Franklin pitching to Wallace, Bud Selig stops play and commands that the World Series winner will be determined by a one-round bare-knuckle boxing match between Matt Holliday and Brett Wallace.</p>
<p>The pair step out to the dirt around home plate and commence the fight.  Wallace absolutely slaughters Holliday; two or three punches and Holliday is down for good.  The Series is over, an A&#8217;s victory.  </p>
<p>After the game, the press hounds Holliday and Wallace for soundbytes.  Holliday pleads that he never had any boxing lessons; the A&#8217;s organizational philosophy of non-violence prevented the team from ever offering violent combat training to its players.  Wallace, on the other hand, expresses his thanks to the Maker for his chance to come up through the Cardinals system, as he learned all his boxing technique from special sessions with Pop Warner during his days in Springfield.</p>
<p>That, my friends, would be irony.  The PCL playoffs?  Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vallon</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12699</link>
		<dc:creator>vallon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not sure but isnt this a talk about minor league players site or about the definition of a word............]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure but isnt this a talk about minor league players site or about the definition of a word&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12698</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9. a free ride, when you&#039;ve already paid
10. good advice, that you just couldn&#039;t take

yah, i really do think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9. a free ride, when you&#8217;ve already paid<br />
10. good advice, that you just couldn&#8217;t take</p>
<p>yah, i really do think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12697</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Debating the definition of irony? You can tell things are slowing down around these parts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debating the definition of irony? You can tell things are slowing down around these parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/09/13/irony/comment-page-1/#comment-12696</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4154#comment-12696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it fits number 5:

1.	the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.
2.	Literature.
a.	a technique of indicating, as through character or plot development, an intention or attitude opposite to that which is actually or ostensibly stated.
b.	(esp. in contemporary writing) a manner of organizing a work so as to give full expression to contradictory or complementary impulses, attitudes, etc., esp. as a means of indicating detachment from a subject, theme, or emotion.
3.	 Socratic irony.
4.	 dramatic irony.
5.	an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.
6.	the incongruity of this.
7.	an objectively sardonic style of speech or writing.
8.	an objectively or humorously sardonic utterance, disposition, quality, etc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it fits number 5:</p>
<p>1.	the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.<br />
2.	Literature.<br />
a.	a technique of indicating, as through character or plot development, an intention or attitude opposite to that which is actually or ostensibly stated.<br />
b.	(esp. in contemporary writing) a manner of organizing a work so as to give full expression to contradictory or complementary impulses, attitudes, etc., esp. as a means of indicating detachment from a subject, theme, or emotion.<br />
3.	 Socratic irony.<br />
4.	 dramatic irony.<br />
5.	an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.<br />
6.	the incongruity of this.<br />
7.	an objectively sardonic style of speech or writing.<br />
8.	an objectively or humorously sardonic utterance, disposition, quality, etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
