<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fangraphs Top 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cariocacardinal</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/comment-page-1/#comment-13613</link>
		<dc:creator>cariocacardinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4330#comment-13613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reifer #7?   I&#039;m not sure you can justify that even on potential with what he&#039;s shown.   Heck, Samuel is less hittable and is much younger - not that I&#039;d rate him near that high either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reifer #7?   I&#8217;m not sure you can justify that even on potential with what he&#8217;s shown.   Heck, Samuel is less hittable and is much younger &#8211; not that I&#8217;d rate him near that high either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Dahlstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/comment-page-1/#comment-13608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Dahlstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4330#comment-13608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For my money I have to agree about Descalso.     I&#039;d like to see a little more production out of him to justify that ranking.     As far a Kozma, well, he wouldn&#039;t be anywhere near my top 10 at this point.    He&#039;s riding on the coattails of his draft position as far as I&#039;m concerned and hasn&#039;t shown enough, whether it&#039;s production or just raw ability to justify a top 10 ranking -  even with the recently depleted system.  It&#039;s the same way I feel about Niko at this point.    I&#039;m guessing he&#039;ll be back at QC this next season and would hope to see something that piqued some interest in him early on.    He just looked overmatched this last season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my money I have to agree about Descalso.     I&#8217;d like to see a little more production out of him to justify that ranking.     As far a Kozma, well, he wouldn&#8217;t be anywhere near my top 10 at this point.    He&#8217;s riding on the coattails of his draft position as far as I&#8217;m concerned and hasn&#8217;t shown enough, whether it&#8217;s production or just raw ability to justify a top 10 ranking &#8211;  even with the recently depleted system.  It&#8217;s the same way I feel about Niko at this point.    I&#8217;m guessing he&#8217;ll be back at QC this next season and would hope to see something that piqued some interest in him early on.    He just looked overmatched this last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaneCoKeith</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/comment-page-1/#comment-13606</link>
		<dc:creator>KaneCoKeith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4330#comment-13606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found the list at this site to be interesting...though not very encouraging.

http://baseballnumbers-diamondfutures.blogspot.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the list at this site to be interesting&#8230;though not very encouraging.</p>
<p><a href="http://baseballnumbers-diamondfutures.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://baseballnumbers-diamondfutures.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abe froman</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/comment-page-1/#comment-13605</link>
		<dc:creator>abe froman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4330#comment-13605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i like BA&#039;s list better.  i am kind of torn between garcia/miller for the number 1 spot, but i think i&#039;d go with garcia.  lower ceiling but higher likelihood of reaching the ceiling.

i am on the freese bandwagon.

the reason i am not quite on the descalso bandwagon is that there is basically only a half season of him mashing the ball and the rest of the stats are kind of mediocre.  i know he has some good excuses like inconsistent playing time in memphis.  i&#039;d probably have a different opinion of him if i actually saw him play, but just arm chairing the rankings i&#039;d put him in the bottom half of the top 10 until i see a little bit more out of him.  there is a lot of &#039;what have you done for me lately&#039; in prospect rankings and descalso hasnt a done a whole lot lately (memphis/AFL).  i am not saying i dont like him as a prospect, just that aside from miller i am taking some guys with a little bit better track records for the top 5.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like BA&#8217;s list better.  i am kind of torn between garcia/miller for the number 1 spot, but i think i&#8217;d go with garcia.  lower ceiling but higher likelihood of reaching the ceiling.</p>
<p>i am on the freese bandwagon.</p>
<p>the reason i am not quite on the descalso bandwagon is that there is basically only a half season of him mashing the ball and the rest of the stats are kind of mediocre.  i know he has some good excuses like inconsistent playing time in memphis.  i&#8217;d probably have a different opinion of him if i actually saw him play, but just arm chairing the rankings i&#8217;d put him in the bottom half of the top 10 until i see a little bit more out of him.  there is a lot of &#8216;what have you done for me lately&#8217; in prospect rankings and descalso hasnt a done a whole lot lately (memphis/AFL).  i am not saying i dont like him as a prospect, just that aside from miller i am taking some guys with a little bit better track records for the top 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azruavatar</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/comment-page-1/#comment-13602</link>
		<dc:creator>azruavatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4330#comment-13602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blech.  Not a fan of that list either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blech.  Not a fan of that list either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easy</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/comment-page-1/#comment-13601</link>
		<dc:creator>easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4330#comment-13601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody&#039;s lists will seem odd to other people because of the dearth of type A prospects this year.  If that is BA&#039;s list I certainly favor it over fangraphs but mine will be much different.  The folks who go for ceiling will like Miller at #1 and wonder why Freese and Craig are so high.  I actually think Freese and Craig are in appropriate spots as they have a high likelihood of playing real roles with the big club over the next couple of years despite their limited ceilings.  There have been a few thousand 19 year old pitching prospects with stuff considered similar to Miller&#039;s who have never seen a major league inning.  Still don&#039;t understand why Descalso is not in anybody&#039;s top five.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody&#8217;s lists will seem odd to other people because of the dearth of type A prospects this year.  If that is BA&#8217;s list I certainly favor it over fangraphs but mine will be much different.  The folks who go for ceiling will like Miller at #1 and wonder why Freese and Craig are so high.  I actually think Freese and Craig are in appropriate spots as they have a high likelihood of playing real roles with the big club over the next couple of years despite their limited ceilings.  There have been a few thousand 19 year old pitching prospects with stuff considered similar to Miller&#8217;s who have never seen a major league inning.  Still don&#8217;t understand why Descalso is not in anybody&#8217;s top five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indiana Cardinal</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/comment-page-1/#comment-13600</link>
		<dc:creator>Indiana Cardinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4330#comment-13600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baseball America&#039;s Cardinal Top 10 List is as follows: 1. P Miller; 2. P Garcia; 3. P Lynn; 4. OF Jones; 5. 3b Freese; 6. P Sanchez; 7. OF Craig; 8. P Hawksworth; 9. 2b Descalso; 10. C Stock]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baseball America&#8217;s Cardinal Top 10 List is as follows: 1. P Miller; 2. P Garcia; 3. P Lynn; 4. OF Jones; 5. 3b Freese; 6. P Sanchez; 7. OF Craig; 8. P Hawksworth; 9. 2b Descalso; 10. C Stock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/11/19/fangraphs-top-10/comment-page-1/#comment-13599</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4330#comment-13599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Move Lance Lynn down to #4, everyone else up a spot,  and I don&#039;t have a problem with that list if you don&#039;t include 2009 draftees ... not sure how you can exclude them though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move Lance Lynn down to #4, everyone else up a spot,  and I don&#8217;t have a problem with that list if you don&#8217;t include 2009 draftees &#8230; not sure how you can exclude them though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
