<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prospect Confidence Poll Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevesommer05</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14983</link>
		<dc:creator>stevesommer05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4587#comment-14983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14977&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;erik&lt;/a&gt;: I&#039;ve got some ideas on that, just have to put them in a coherent format.  I think asking the right question in the poll to get at the peak is more important than the math to get to WAR distributions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14977" rel="nofollow">erik</a>: I&#8217;ve got some ideas on that, just have to put them in a coherent format.  I think asking the right question in the poll to get at the peak is more important than the math to get to WAR distributions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14977</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4587#comment-14977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14974&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Steve Sommer&lt;/a&gt;: Right, I like the idea. Not sure how to implement it at the moment, but I&#039;m all ears to suggestions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14974" rel="nofollow">Steve Sommer</a>: Right, I like the idea. Not sure how to implement it at the moment, but I&#8217;m all ears to suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14974</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4587#comment-14974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And by peak I mean peak in the cost controlled years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And by peak I mean peak in the cost controlled years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RydeShelby</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14973</link>
		<dc:creator>RydeShelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4587#comment-14973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cards have a lot of budding Skip Schumakers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cards have a lot of budding Skip Schumakers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14972</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4587#comment-14972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My expectations for Pham&#039;s bat jumped after he moved off short. At the time, I hoped it was a short-term move to take some pressure off that side of the game, but if that&#039;s what it were, it hasn&#039;t worked over a reasonably long term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My expectations for Pham&#8217;s bat jumped after he moved off short. At the time, I hoped it was a short-term move to take some pressure off that side of the game, but if that&#8217;s what it were, it hasn&#8217;t worked over a reasonably long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14970</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4587#comment-14970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d think the next step(s) would be to gather information about peaks... ie we think Craig is likely to have at least a 0.355 wOBA, but what&#039;s the peak, 0.365-0.370 maybe with a confidence of 2-3.  Given those data points we could work up a WAR distribution over the cost controlled years... which is Bryan&#039;s goal as I understand it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d think the next step(s) would be to gather information about peaks&#8230; ie we think Craig is likely to have at least a 0.355 wOBA, but what&#8217;s the peak, 0.365-0.370 maybe with a confidence of 2-3.  Given those data points we could work up a WAR distribution over the cost controlled years&#8230; which is Bryan&#8217;s goal as I understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14969</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4587#comment-14969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14968&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;easy&lt;/a&gt;: Consensus as far as hitters, you should say. Even Joe Strauss is hyperventilating over Shelby Miller. But yeah, I&#039;d say it&#039;s a good return on the farm system if we can get a couple of average players to go along with Colby. And let&#039;s not forget about the Walrus, who should be a 3 WAR player or maybe a bit better in Toronto.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14968" rel="nofollow">easy</a>: Consensus as far as hitters, you should say. Even Joe Strauss is hyperventilating over Shelby Miller. But yeah, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a good return on the farm system if we can get a couple of average players to go along with Colby. And let&#8217;s not forget about the Walrus, who should be a 3 WAR player or maybe a bit better in Toronto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easy</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/03/16/prospect-confidence-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-14968</link>
		<dc:creator>easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=4587#comment-14968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fun exercise and I have almost no quarrel with the consensus.  I had Descalso at 4 but that&#039;s the bat in my belfry.  I also give Kozma a little better chance than others.  Pham&#039;s the wild card but I don&#039;t blame anyone for being pessimistic.
The ratings do seem to reflect the consensus ratings of the system.  Quite a few guys who will have careers but no impact players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun exercise and I have almost no quarrel with the consensus.  I had Descalso at 4 but that&#8217;s the bat in my belfry.  I also give Kozma a little better chance than others.  Pham&#8217;s the wild card but I don&#8217;t blame anyone for being pessimistic.<br />
The ratings do seem to reflect the consensus ratings of the system.  Quite a few guys who will have careers but no impact players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
