<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cardinals draft 3B Zack Cox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CDD Draft Spectacular Photo Thursday &#171; Diamond Diaries</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-35623</link>
		<dc:creator>The CDD Draft Spectacular Photo Thursday &#171; Diamond Diaries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-35623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We feel fairly confident in our ability to talk Cardinal baseball here at Cardinal Diamond Diaries. We even know a bit about the minor leagues. However, we are not about to pretend to know anything about the MLB draft that concluded yesterday. That would be ridiculous.    If you are looking for real draft coverage, we recommend www.futureredbirds.net. Those boys know the draft. We&#8217;ll even make it easy and link to their 2010 draft information. Just click on each player&#8217;s name to learn all the goodies we would not even pretend to know.   What we do know is pictures!  So for our own special touch in covering the draft, we have collected that vital piece of information missing from most draft reviews: pictures of the Cardinals&#8217; draft picks &#8211; limiting it to the first 12 rounds due to space and attention span.      Round 1 (#25 overall) &#8211; Zach Cox [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We feel fairly confident in our ability to talk Cardinal baseball here at Cardinal Diamond Diaries. We even know a bit about the minor leagues. However, we are not about to pretend to know anything about the MLB draft that concluded yesterday. That would be ridiculous.    If you are looking for real draft coverage, we recommend <a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.futureredbirds.net</a>. Those boys know the draft. We&#8217;ll even make it easy and link to their 2010 draft information. Just click on each player&#8217;s name to learn all the goodies we would not even pretend to know.   What we do know is pictures!  So for our own special touch in covering the draft, we have collected that vital piece of information missing from most draft reviews: pictures of the Cardinals&#8217; draft picks &#8211; limiting it to the first 12 rounds due to space and attention span.      Round 1 (#25 overall) &#8211; Zach Cox [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-18142</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-18142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saturday night at 9pm on ESPNU Arkansas plays Arizona State University in the first of there 3 game series.  Good chance to see Cox and Blair and Swagerty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday night at 9pm on ESPNU Arkansas plays Arizona State University in the first of there 3 game series.  Good chance to see Cox and Blair and Swagerty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draft Coverage &#124; Future Redbirds</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17878</link>
		<dc:creator>Draft Coverage &#124; Future Redbirds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-17878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Round 1, Pick 25: Zach Cox [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Round 1, Pick 25: Zach Cox [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hogwildcard</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17853</link>
		<dc:creator>Hogwildcard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-17853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah I&#039;ve seen him play second a few times at Arkansas and he is solid by college standards. He is not the most athletic, but he has good reaction speed and a good feel. I personally think if the hogs had a better option at third he would likely have played a great deal more at second. Although I don&#039;t think he will ever be much above average defensively, but his bat more than makes up for this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#8217;ve seen him play second a few times at Arkansas and he is solid by college standards. He is not the most athletic, but he has good reaction speed and a good feel. I personally think if the hogs had a better option at third he would likely have played a great deal more at second. Although I don&#8217;t think he will ever be much above average defensively, but his bat more than makes up for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jws003</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17742</link>
		<dc:creator>jws003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-17742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17739&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;deez&lt;/a&gt;: 

Thanks for the correction deez, I wasn&#039;t aware that Cox had played a few games a 2B this year, but I was pretty positive that he was a still a 3B for the Razorbacks and as you said, had definitely not been transitioned to 2B.

I&#039;m with you on the Eibner pick too. I wish he would have been around for the Cardinals to get in the 2nd round, you don&#039;t stumble accross too many guys with great speed, great arms and amazing power very often. I think he will be an outstanding player if he can manage to keep his average high and his K totals low..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17739" rel="nofollow">deez</a>: </p>
<p>Thanks for the correction deez, I wasn&#8217;t aware that Cox had played a few games a 2B this year, but I was pretty positive that he was a still a 3B for the Razorbacks and as you said, had definitely not been transitioned to 2B.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on the Eibner pick too. I wish he would have been around for the Cardinals to get in the 2nd round, you don&#8217;t stumble accross too many guys with great speed, great arms and amazing power very often. I think he will be an outstanding player if he can manage to keep his average high and his K totals low..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deez</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17739</link>
		<dc:creator>deez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-17739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cox did play second on a few occasions this year, although the vast majority  of his time was spent at third. (I think he played second some earlier in the year when Bo Bigham was hurt...and maybe during some of Van Horn&#039;s reshuffling when Bigham was playing right) He did a pretty good job filling in , but the other posters are correct in that he was never  &quot;transitioned&quot; to 2B. I would&#039;ve liked to have seen him on the mound again, but the need wasn&#039;t there. For the Hogs, the defense is so much more solid with him at third, and Bigham is a more athletic 2B. His hitting definitely improved from last year, I didn&#039;t mind power #&#039;s being down as he&#039;s hitting in front of Eibner and Wilkins who can dent scoreboards with the best of them. If he makes it to the big club, you need guys getting on in front of the big boys and he fills that role. Hopefully, they can make a second baseman of him...they did it for Skip. Not sure ZC has Skip&#039;s athleticism, that doesn&#039;t mean that he doesn&#039;t...just that he hasn&#039;t had the opportunity to show it. Now the Cards need to get Eibner. The boy is one helluva CF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cox did play second on a few occasions this year, although the vast majority  of his time was spent at third. (I think he played second some earlier in the year when Bo Bigham was hurt&#8230;and maybe during some of Van Horn&#8217;s reshuffling when Bigham was playing right) He did a pretty good job filling in , but the other posters are correct in that he was never  &#8220;transitioned&#8221; to 2B. I would&#8217;ve liked to have seen him on the mound again, but the need wasn&#8217;t there. For the Hogs, the defense is so much more solid with him at third, and Bigham is a more athletic 2B. His hitting definitely improved from last year, I didn&#8217;t mind power #&#8217;s being down as he&#8217;s hitting in front of Eibner and Wilkins who can dent scoreboards with the best of them. If he makes it to the big club, you need guys getting on in front of the big boys and he fills that role. Hopefully, they can make a second baseman of him&#8230;they did it for Skip. Not sure ZC has Skip&#8217;s athleticism, that doesn&#8217;t mean that he doesn&#8217;t&#8230;just that he hasn&#8217;t had the opportunity to show it. Now the Cards need to get Eibner. The boy is one helluva CF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jws003</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17727</link>
		<dc:creator>jws003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-17727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17660&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew&lt;/a&gt;: 

Trust me man, I go to school with Cox and have seen nearly every one of his collegiate games at Arkansas. He has played 3B all year and DH&#039;ed on occassion, I&#039;m absolutely positive of this because the Hogs current 2B is named Bo Bingham and he is very solid defensively which is why he has stuck there. That being said, Cox has a strong arm at 3rd and good instincts. He&#039;s not the quickest guy or a guy with great range, but his instincts and quick hands should make up for any shortcomings he has and should easily allow him to move to 2B if the Cardinals decide to do that. I think it would be the best decision and it would ensure that he is expedited through the system, but an interview with Lunhow yesterday revealed that the Cardinals will start him off at 3B.

His swing was criticized last year because it generated power, but it made it easier for Cox to strike out and harder for him to hit for a high average. He completely retooled his swing in less than a year, and the results have been phenomenal. He&#039;s still hit 9 HR&#039;s, which is fairly solid for a college sophomore, and he has raised his batting average to well over .400 while increasing his walk totals and decreasing his strikeout totals. He&#039;s a very good hitter and a little bit of tweaking to his swing could add back a little more power, while still keeping his average high and strikeout totals low. Basically, if he can stick at 3B or make the move to 2B, he will be an absolute masher who can produce runs and hit to all fields with solid power.

I think he&#039;s a better hitter and better overall player than Brett Wallace. Obviously there will be comparisons between the two, but I never thought Wallace had a chance to stick at 3rd, however I&#039;m fairly confident that Cox will be able to remain at 3B or move to 2B. He&#039;s just a baseball player and he will work hard to make the transition to whatever position he is placed at. All in all, I think the Cardinals got a polished player with a very high ceiling. He could be an All-Star caliber player, but I also don&#039;t think he will be anything less than a solid major-leaguer. Really a great pick for the Cardinals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17660" rel="nofollow">Andrew</a>: </p>
<p>Trust me man, I go to school with Cox and have seen nearly every one of his collegiate games at Arkansas. He has played 3B all year and DH&#8217;ed on occassion, I&#8217;m absolutely positive of this because the Hogs current 2B is named Bo Bingham and he is very solid defensively which is why he has stuck there. That being said, Cox has a strong arm at 3rd and good instincts. He&#8217;s not the quickest guy or a guy with great range, but his instincts and quick hands should make up for any shortcomings he has and should easily allow him to move to 2B if the Cardinals decide to do that. I think it would be the best decision and it would ensure that he is expedited through the system, but an interview with Lunhow yesterday revealed that the Cardinals will start him off at 3B.</p>
<p>His swing was criticized last year because it generated power, but it made it easier for Cox to strike out and harder for him to hit for a high average. He completely retooled his swing in less than a year, and the results have been phenomenal. He&#8217;s still hit 9 HR&#8217;s, which is fairly solid for a college sophomore, and he has raised his batting average to well over .400 while increasing his walk totals and decreasing his strikeout totals. He&#8217;s a very good hitter and a little bit of tweaking to his swing could add back a little more power, while still keeping his average high and strikeout totals low. Basically, if he can stick at 3B or make the move to 2B, he will be an absolute masher who can produce runs and hit to all fields with solid power.</p>
<p>I think he&#8217;s a better hitter and better overall player than Brett Wallace. Obviously there will be comparisons between the two, but I never thought Wallace had a chance to stick at 3rd, however I&#8217;m fairly confident that Cox will be able to remain at 3B or move to 2B. He&#8217;s just a baseball player and he will work hard to make the transition to whatever position he is placed at. All in all, I think the Cardinals got a polished player with a very high ceiling. He could be an All-Star caliber player, but I also don&#8217;t think he will be anything less than a solid major-leaguer. Really a great pick for the Cardinals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17711</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-17711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew, I believe the Cardinals wouldnt draft Zach in the first round if they werent planning on signing him.  Plus, this is probably the best oportunity for Zach to maxamize his money.  Next years draft is apparently &quot;stocked&quot; and then he loses another year of leverage.  I think the real question is, What level does he start at next year?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, I believe the Cardinals wouldnt draft Zach in the first round if they werent planning on signing him.  Plus, this is probably the best oportunity for Zach to maxamize his money.  Next years draft is apparently &#8220;stocked&#8221; and then he loses another year of leverage.  I think the real question is, What level does he start at next year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanky</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17692</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-17692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s the same story as Wallace, in a good way: He has a plus-plus hit tool, and the Cards will figure out his position later. If he can hit, he&#039;ll have value, either with the Cards or somewhere else. But, Freese barely has 200 AB&#039;s at the major-league level, and Schumaker is already 30 and will hit free agency soon, so Luhnow did a nice job of adding an advanced bat who can play one of those positions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the same story as Wallace, in a good way: He has a plus-plus hit tool, and the Cards will figure out his position later. If he can hit, he&#8217;ll have value, either with the Cards or somewhere else. But, Freese barely has 200 AB&#8217;s at the major-league level, and Schumaker is already 30 and will hit free agency soon, so Luhnow did a nice job of adding an advanced bat who can play one of those positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/07/cardinals-draft-3b-zack-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-17686</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5219#comment-17686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex not sure if I agree, with the high price tag that Cox will demand not sure we draft alot of high risk high reward guys. At least not any that want alot of money. I do agree when will draft a few but not the &quot;name&quot; ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex not sure if I agree, with the high price tag that Cox will demand not sure we draft alot of high risk high reward guys. At least not any that want alot of money. I do agree when will draft a few but not the &#8220;name&#8221; ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
