<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round 2, Pick 75: Matthew Swagerty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meet Cards Prospect Jordan Swagerty &#124; Redbird Rants &#124; A St. Louis Cardinals Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-24095</link>
		<dc:creator>Meet Cards Prospect Jordan Swagerty &#124; Redbird Rants &#124; A St. Louis Cardinals Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-24095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] From ESPN: &#8220;He’s aggressive, competitive, and a little hyper on the mound, and could move quickly through the minors as a one-inning guy who’s already accustomed to that role.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From ESPN: &#8220;He’s aggressive, competitive, and a little hyper on the mound, and could move quickly through the minors as a one-inning guy who’s already accustomed to that role.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17908</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is going to be used as a starter from what I have read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is going to be used as a starter from what I have read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azruavatar</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17874</link>
		<dc:creator>azruavatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17791&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gruntosaurus&lt;/a&gt;: I&#039;m talking about the way the Cardinals are going to utilize them. College relievers that they try in the rotation. I wasn&#039;t speaking to their stuff, mechanics or profile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17791" rel="nofollow">Gruntosaurus</a>: I&#8217;m talking about the way the Cardinals are going to utilize them. College relievers that they try in the rotation. I wasn&#8217;t speaking to their stuff, mechanics or profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gruntosaurus</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17791</link>
		<dc:creator>Gruntosaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AZ, I don&#039;t see the Todd similarities.  Very different body type, and to the extent that I know anything about the subject, the mechanics don&#039;t look similar either.  There&#039;s more to comparisons than similarities in results.

This said, I like this choice.  I am not convinced that Duncan will, however, given his apparent preference for tall guys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AZ, I don&#8217;t see the Todd similarities.  Very different body type, and to the extent that I know anything about the subject, the mechanics don&#8217;t look similar either.  There&#8217;s more to comparisons than similarities in results.</p>
<p>This said, I like this choice.  I am not convinced that Duncan will, however, given his apparent preference for tall guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forsch31</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17737</link>
		<dc:creator>Forsch31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After watching the video over at the MLB site, I&#039;m liking the pick better. The man is extremely quick on the mound with hardly any extraneous movement in his mechanics, and he&#039;s supposed to have great command over his pitches, which is a nice change for a Cards draft pick. The only real worries I see that keep popping up are whether his size will allow him to be a starter or not.

Could be a fun prospect to follow....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching the video over at the MLB site, I&#8217;m liking the pick better. The man is extremely quick on the mound with hardly any extraneous movement in his mechanics, and he&#8217;s supposed to have great command over his pitches, which is a nice change for a Cards draft pick. The only real worries I see that keep popping up are whether his size will allow him to be a starter or not.</p>
<p>Could be a fun prospect to follow&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanky</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17736</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swagerty rated by Baseball America as 61st best overall player. So, we at least got value here, according to BA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swagerty rated by Baseball America as 61st best overall player. So, we at least got value here, according to BA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17725</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17721&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;zuke354&lt;/a&gt;: Yes they do at least at QC, not sure about PB.  And I was thinking the same thing, have him &quot;start&quot; and go about 4-5 innings at most to see if he has starter potential before forcing him into the releiver role.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17721" rel="nofollow">zuke354</a>: Yes they do at least at QC, not sure about PB.  And I was thinking the same thing, have him &#8220;start&#8221; and go about 4-5 innings at most to see if he has starter potential before forcing him into the releiver role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17722</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Little glam, but a solid choice]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little glam, but a solid choice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuke354</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17721</link>
		<dc:creator>zuke354</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do the cards still piggyback starters at the lower levels? I think that type of development would fit a kid like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the cards still piggyback starters at the lower levels? I think that type of development would fit a kid like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karmaloop</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/08/round-2-pick-75-matthew-swagerty/comment-page-1/#comment-17720</link>
		<dc:creator>Karmaloop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5248#comment-17720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually could be a closer in the bigs.  An 8/9 of Blair and Swagerty is pretty good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually could be a closer in the bigs.  An 8/9 of Blair and Swagerty is pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
