<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Checking in on some old friends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19109</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree in fact I think Wallace was drafted as trade bait from day 1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree in fact I think Wallace was drafted as trade bait from day 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azruavatar</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19106</link>
		<dc:creator>azruavatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19104&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;zuke354&lt;/a&gt;: Wallace was never going to play third.  It was a line the Cardinals repeated in one of their few well-done efforts to preserve a prospect&#039;s value.  He was destined for 1B from draft day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19104" rel="nofollow">zuke354</a>: Wallace was never going to play third.  It was a line the Cardinals repeated in one of their few well-done efforts to preserve a prospect&#8217;s value.  He was destined for 1B from draft day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuke354</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19104</link>
		<dc:creator>zuke354</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wallace has lost significant value since the cards traded him. At the time, there was still a chance he could play third. Now, it looks like it will be DH/1st base.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallace has lost significant value since the cards traded him. At the time, there was still a chance he could play third. Now, it looks like it will be DH/1st base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cariocacardinal</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19099</link>
		<dc:creator>cariocacardinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Suppan was actually released before we picked him up (which I&#039;m pretty sure he was) than we have no obligation towards his buyout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Suppan was actually released before we picked him up (which I&#8217;m pretty sure he was) than we have no obligation towards his buyout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deke</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19090</link>
		<dc:creator>deke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 06:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19072&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chad&lt;/a&gt;: is that for sure?  i&#039;ve heard it both ways, that we&#039;re on the hook for that, and that we&#039;re not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19072" rel="nofollow">Chad</a>: is that for sure?  i&#8217;ve heard it both ways, that we&#8217;re on the hook for that, and that we&#8217;re not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azruavatar</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19073</link>
		<dc:creator>azruavatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19026&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Forsch31&lt;/a&gt;: I can&#039;t tale much credit on Gregerson. I never would have predicted this.  I&#039;d like to think I picked up on him as a good middle relief prospect (there&#039;s a comparison of relievers I did at one point but can&#039;t find now) but beyond that I didn&#039;t have any real issue with the trade.

I feel a little better about how I analyzed the Matt Holliday trade.  I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/06/26/prime-pitching-prospect/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; about Mortensen one month before the trade.  This was my breakdown of the trade &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/07/25/matt-holliday-tangled-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and it was hit and miss.  Brett Wallace was never my favorite prospect though I think he&#039;ll be fine in the long run.  I think I was in Springfield the weekend this took place much to my consternation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19026" rel="nofollow">Forsch31</a>: I can&#8217;t tale much credit on Gregerson. I never would have predicted this.  I&#8217;d like to think I picked up on him as a good middle relief prospect (there&#8217;s a comparison of relievers I did at one point but can&#8217;t find now) but beyond that I didn&#8217;t have any real issue with the trade.</p>
<p>I feel a little better about how I analyzed the Matt Holliday trade.  I wrote <a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/06/26/prime-pitching-prospect/" rel="nofollow">this</a> about Mortensen one month before the trade.  This was my breakdown of the trade <a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2009/07/25/matt-holliday-tangled-web/" rel="nofollow">here</a> and it was hit and miss.  Brett Wallace was never my favorite prospect though I think he&#8217;ll be fine in the long run.  I think I was in Springfield the weekend this took place much to my consternation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19072</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suppan will cost us next year even if we do not want him.  He has a 2 million buy out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suppan will cost us next year even if we do not want him.  He has a 2 million buy out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tackle Box</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19068</link>
		<dc:creator>Tackle Box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19059&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sam&lt;/a&gt;: 

Suppan cost us nothing.  It was more than worth the gamble and he&#039;s pretty much paid for himself already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19059" rel="nofollow">Sam</a>: </p>
<p>Suppan cost us nothing.  It was more than worth the gamble and he&#8217;s pretty much paid for himself already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19059</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guy we should be missing right now is Mortenson. Could have saved us the return of Jeff Suppan. Of course Suppan has been surprisingly decent so far, and Hawksworth somehow pitched all right in his spot start yesterday, but Morrtenson looks like he&#039;s going to be that solid 4th/5th type innings eater everyone expected despite getting rocked in the majors in his last stint.

Losing Gregerson really is a shame. He could be the best reliever in all of baseball right now and looks like he&#039;ll stay that way for years barring injury.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy we should be missing right now is Mortenson. Could have saved us the return of Jeff Suppan. Of course Suppan has been surprisingly decent so far, and Hawksworth somehow pitched all right in his spot start yesterday, but Morrtenson looks like he&#8217;s going to be that solid 4th/5th type innings eater everyone expected despite getting rocked in the majors in his last stint.</p>
<p>Losing Gregerson really is a shame. He could be the best reliever in all of baseball right now and looks like he&#8217;ll stay that way for years barring injury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2010/06/26/checking-in-on-some-old-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-19053</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 15:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=5451#comment-19053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry meant to say 3 or 4, some have said Lance Lynn with better stuff.  I did see him in the first game against Arkansas where he was dominant for 2 i nnings and the wheels fell off.  I think the team likes him because he is another &quot;bulldog&quot; in the system.  I&#039;m not too worried about him as I think he will sign for slot and will be in Batavia or QC shortly.  I think he moves more quickly than Kelly as conversion isn&#039;t a factor.  I agree he&#039;s not a 2 for sure but in a 3-4 range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry meant to say 3 or 4, some have said Lance Lynn with better stuff.  I did see him in the first game against Arkansas where he was dominant for 2 i nnings and the wheels fell off.  I think the team likes him because he is another &#8220;bulldog&#8221; in the system.  I&#8217;m not too worried about him as I think he will sign for slot and will be in Batavia or QC shortly.  I think he moves more quickly than Kelly as conversion isn&#8217;t a factor.  I agree he&#8217;s not a 2 for sure but in a 3-4 range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
