<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday&#8217;s Mock Draft Check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Tierney</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39800</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Tierney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my most updated draft:
http://85percentsports.com/2011/06/06/2011-mlb-mock-draft-version-4-0-final-version/

Based off what I&#039;ve read, the Cards are looking at a safe position player.  I went with Wong for the fact that it&#039;s a safe pick and a guy that could move quickly into a weak position.  It&#039;s not my favorite pick for them, but goes with what I&#039;ve read and heard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my most updated draft:<br />
<a href="http://85percentsports.com/2011/06/06/2011-mlb-mock-draft-version-4-0-final-version/" rel="nofollow">http://85percentsports.com/2011/06/06/2011-mlb-mock-draft-version-4-0-final-version/</a></p>
<p>Based off what I&#8217;ve read, the Cards are looking at a safe position player.  I went with Wong for the fact that it&#8217;s a safe pick and a guy that could move quickly into a weak position.  It&#8217;s not my favorite pick for them, but goes with what I&#8217;ve read and heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39718</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 03:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just wrapped up my 3 Part series on the Cards draft.  Part 3 focuses on potential targets in the 2nd and 3rd Rds.  head over to redbirddugout.com and check it out.  Can&#039;t wait for tomorrow night!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wrapped up my 3 Part series on the Cards draft.  Part 3 focuses on potential targets in the 2nd and 3rd Rds.  head over to redbirddugout.com and check it out.  Can&#8217;t wait for tomorrow night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vision</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39702</link>
		<dc:creator>Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, that&#039;s fair. It&#039;s pretty much a pick your best out of a bag of similarly rated kids.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, that&#8217;s fair. It&#8217;s pretty much a pick your best out of a bag of similarly rated kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39701</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was saying i like Howard more than Fernandez, Stephenson thats all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was saying i like Howard more than Fernandez, Stephenson thats all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vision</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39697</link>
		<dc:creator>Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What exactly are you disagreeing with?

I do tend to agree that Fernandez is at his projection physically, and probably is going to be a guy you have to worry about his conditioning. However, he also has the stuff NOW as opposed to a projection like a Owens. Fernandez is going to be expensive as well.

I also agree Stephenson will most likely be gone as well, but if we&#039;re talking about who we like and don&#039;t like, I&#039;m going to talk about who I like and don&#039;t like as much. Stephenson has been a guy I&#039;ve really liked all along, and he could go anywhere from 15 to into the sandwich rounds. There will be surprise picks...there always are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly are you disagreeing with?</p>
<p>I do tend to agree that Fernandez is at his projection physically, and probably is going to be a guy you have to worry about his conditioning. However, he also has the stuff NOW as opposed to a projection like a Owens. Fernandez is going to be expensive as well.</p>
<p>I also agree Stephenson will most likely be gone as well, but if we&#8217;re talking about who we like and don&#8217;t like, I&#8217;m going to talk about who I like and don&#8217;t like as much. Stephenson has been a guy I&#8217;ve really liked all along, and he could go anywhere from 15 to into the sandwich rounds. There will be surprise picks&#8230;there always are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39671</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completely disagree, Stephenson will be gone because he&#039;s going to take slot for the Dodgers but Fernandez is already at his projection and I see him filling out like Jonathan Broxton.  He screams closer.  Which is good but not at 22 with all these other guys available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely disagree, Stephenson will be gone because he&#8217;s going to take slot for the Dodgers but Fernandez is already at his projection and I see him filling out like Jonathan Broxton.  He screams closer.  Which is good but not at 22 with all these other guys available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vision</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39670</link>
		<dc:creator>Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well yeah, I said above Norris is my top choice for that pick. Next to no chance Guerrieri is there, so I didn&#039;t include him. Despite the fact that Owens is committed to my beloved Canes, I just don&#039;t really &quot;love&quot; him. I think he&#039;s a projection guy on velocity, and there are guys with velocity and stuff NOW, that also have projection.

I&#039;ve cooled on Owens since my first thought on him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yeah, I said above Norris is my top choice for that pick. Next to no chance Guerrieri is there, so I didn&#8217;t include him. Despite the fact that Owens is committed to my beloved Canes, I just don&#8217;t really &#8220;love&#8221; him. I think he&#8217;s a projection guy on velocity, and there are guys with velocity and stuff NOW, that also have projection.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve cooled on Owens since my first thought on him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39662</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also have Norris, Owens and Guerrieri as better options.  Guerrieri is the least likely to be there out of all the guys mentioned but his upside is extreme.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have Norris, Owens and Guerrieri as better options.  Guerrieri is the least likely to be there out of all the guys mentioned but his upside is extreme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vision</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39661</link>
		<dc:creator>Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 16:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Than Howard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Than Howard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vision</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2011/06/03/fridays-mock-draft-check/comment-page-1/#comment-39660</link>
		<dc:creator>Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=7268#comment-39660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Stephenson or Jose Fernandez are much better picks in my view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Stephenson or Jose Fernandez are much better picks in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
