Of all the Jeff Luhnow era drafts, the one I reacted the most negatively towards was the 2007 draft led by Pete Kozma and Clayton Mortensen.  I came around on Mortensen and still wonder a bit if he couldn’t turn into a useful reliever or back end starter some day but the Pete Kozma pick at #1 will forever rankle. One of the few giddy moments from that draft was the 4th round selection: Kyle Russell.  Whatever happened to that guy?

In 2007, Russell was a divisive prospect for scouts who were concerned about how his swing would translate but impressed by the athleticism and raw power he displayed at times. Quoting Baseball America:

He has a quick bat and lefthanded power to all fields, and he also offers solid athleticism, speed and arm strength. Yet a lot of scouts aren’t sold on his stroke and approach. They say it’s a grooved swing with too much uppercut, and pitchers can get him out by working up in the zone or coming inside. They also wonder how he’ll handle quality lefthanders.

Russell was often referred to as a first-round pick but there were rumors that he would slip because of bonus demands and because of the reservations that some scouts had. There were teams that had Russell high on their draft lists and teams that had him lasting into the 5th round.  A draft eligible sophomore, Kyle Russell was selected by the Cardinals in the 4th round and things got interesting quickly.

Initial indications were that he might sign with the club at one point telling Derrick Goold: “I wanted to tell them, ‘I’m ready to go,’” he said. “Draft me.” Of course, the conventional wisdom was that it would go up to the deadline on August 15th.  Then things started to sour.  But wait, Luhnow was still optimistic as July came to a close.  Indeed, indications were that he would sign with the club just 6 days away from the deadline.  Alas, Russell and the club were too far apart on the signing bonus.  And over the next several months, details would trickle out that left a bad taste in your mouth about the whole situation.

The Russell signing was shortly after I had joined with Erik to work on Future Redbirds in an effort to increase the coverage of the minor leagues. Russell was one of the first draftees who we followed closely for a protracted period of time and it was admittedly disappointing when he didn’t sign. In 2008, Russell had a less impressive season at Texas and was drafted in the 3rd round by the Los Angeles Dodgers for $410k, well below his 7 figure discussions with the Cardinals.

One of the criticisms at the time of the non-signing by the Cardinals was Russell’s selection in the 4th round rather than the 3rd, which made him an unprotected draft pick. When the Cardinals failed to sign him, they received no subsequent year do-over draft pick.  Instead the club would watch Russell go to rookie league with the Dodgers in 2008 to start his professional career and the Cardinals would go home empty handed.

Since beginning his professional career, Russell has been mostly as advertised. He’s shown tremendous raw power with ISOs over .200 at every stop and a flawed plate approach that has him striking out over 30% of his plate appearances. Russell has mollified that somewhat with a walk rate over 10% but as he’s advanced to AA, he’s struggled to maintain his batting average in the face of better offspeed and breaking pitches.  As a 25 year old in AA, Russell is hitting .260/.338/.498 at Chattanooga in the Southern League.

Ultimately, the Cardinals may have made the right decision not signing him. He’s old for a player at AA though he is hitting well relative to his league (127 wRC+).  The Cardinals don’t really have an approximate to Kyle Russell in the system (a corner outfielder with raw power but poor plate discipline).  Kyle Russell, in many ways, was drafted on the advent of higher minor league scrutiny and his story with the Cardinals is one of my earliest recollections with Future Redbirds. The Cardinals haven’t had quite the same will-he-won’t-he situation (though Austin Wilson evoked memories of it) since Russell and it will be a long time before we know whether the player or the club was “right”.

21 Responses to “The 2007 Non-Signee”
  1. roarke says:

    Ah, the good old days. How did Austin Wilson do in his first year at Stanford, anyway?

  2. Shanky says:

    Wilson’s 2011 season: .311 5 30 .771 OPS 56 K’s in 196 AB’s. . .but only 7 BBs. All in all not a bad freshman season. He could be a monster in 2 years.

  3. pitch and hit says:

    Here’s another 2007 who didn’t sign, Mike Stutes, Philly releiver.

  4. Lou Schuler says:

    I’ve often wondered what went wrong in 2007. Was the scouting staff overconfident after good drafts in ’05 and ’06? On the analysis side, were they working with flawed assumptions about what their data could and couldn’t tell them? Really, 2007 is the only Luhnow-era draft so far that looks like the crapshoot drafts of the Jocketty era.

    We might end up with some nice complementary players out of that draft (Tony Cruz, Descalso, Chambers …) but not a single impact guy.

    So far 2008 doesn’t look a whole lot better, but at least the first two guys — Wallace and Lynn — figure to be solid MLB regulars.

    • zuke354 says:

      To determine if something went wrong, you would have to look and see if you really were that much worse that the rest of baseball. I am not seeing that with 2007.

      If you get 2 solid ML players out of a draft, its probably a good draft.

  5. erik says:

    Hindsight truly is 20/20. I remember being way too hacked off when they didn’t sign Russell.

  6. chuckb says:

    Am I right in remembering that Luhnow and Russell’s people were close to getting a deal done and then Walt just put the kibosh on it?

    And I don’t agree that the team was correct in not signing him. The price wouldn’t have been that high and just b/c he probably won’t make it doesn’t mean it wasn’t a risk worth trying. It had the chance of being a very high payoff and I would have liked to have seen the team sign him.

  7. siddfynch says:

    I just remember being pissed they didn’t draft him earlier, in a protected round. Still would love to see the front office explain that one – I’m sure there’s a reason, but it didn’t look good then, and looks even worse now. Ugh.

    • zuke354 says:

      You mean explain why they almost overpaid for a guy who probably took less money the following year?

      • siddfynch says:

        That too, potentially.

        But how close did they really come to overpaying? I don’t really know the answer, but I think I recall pretty clearly that he was going to be a big-name cost…so why not take him in a protected slot?

  8. Mrs. TLR says:

    Who did the Cards draft ahead of Russell?
    Kozma (AAA rookie, younger than AA Russell);
    Mortensen (promising rookie for Colorado);
    David Kopp (unpromising at AA);
    Jess Todd (once promising, now AAA reliever);
    and Daniel Descalso (Cards rookie).
    At least the Cards did well to select Descalso ahead of Russell.
    In retrospect it would have been better to draft Russell rather than Kopp or Todd, but who could know Kopp would have injuries and turn out as he has?

    • pitch and hit says:

      Russell made high bonus demands which made him unattractive to many teams, I was surprised the cards took a chance. Cardinals never give into bonus demands, they draft on who wants to be a cardinal and who is willing to take what they offer without bickering, that’s why they sign so many more than most teams. Kozma obviously was willing and able, once they got him they obviously needed pitching, 3 college pitchers (one a senior) much cheaper than taking Russell who would not sign for slot anyway. Keep in mind that most slots were down that year, as suggested by MLB. It may very well be that in the end (years from now) he turns out to be the better player than all of them, but hey, that’s the draft.
      How many times have you seen any of the above mentioned players in person, or do you just go by stats? I was curious how people form their opinions. Like Todd, do you know why they like him? Or Kopp, what the real story is on him?
      All except a few pitchers are drafted with starter in mind, it is the job of the farm to turn out starters, some take other paths, especially in this organization, to move forward. Being able to start, and releive, helps your cause (Lynn).

      • Mrs. TLR says:

        The Cards sometimes go over slot, as with McElroy this year, plus Cox and Jenkins last year.

        Kopp missed 2007 with a foot problem. In 2008, he had shoulder soreness that held him to 42 IP. In 09, it knocked him out at 90 IP. In 2010, Kopp had a fine season at Springfield, and got slammed in the PCL; he shouldered 164 IP. He throws a sinker with good velocity and a slider. He began this season with a health difficulty again. The Cards seem to have accepted his shoulder is not sturdy enough for starting and are easing him into relief. Kopp is a bit like Gary Daley Jr, good arm, when not sore, but could use a changeup.
        Todd has fastball & good slider.

        • pitch and hit says:

          You are close on Kopp but not accurate, I assume most info you get from what is printed rather than spoken.

          Todd throws a cut FB, hides it well, not fast, that’s how he gets people out. He is a one inning pitcher at this point.

  9. Andrew says:

    Kopp could still turn into a very dominant reliever if they keep him there.

  10. Dan says:

    Kyle Russell is playing at the AA level for the Dodgers. He is hitting .261 with 16 home runs in 330 at bats. He strikes out way too much.

  11. cj says:

    I don’t really think Mortenson is considered a promising prospect by Colorado, I think he has made a few starts this year but not really.impressed

  12.  
Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>