The St. Louis Cardinals have upgraded their farm system in a major way the past two seasons.  Just last year Baseball America ranked their club 29th out of all 30 major league teams.  They received a relatively small bump up to being ranked 24th earlier this season after the Cardinals drafted Zack Cox, Tyrell Jenkins, and saw the beginning of the rise of a now highly touted prospect by the name of Carlos Martinez.  In 2012, it’s entirely possible that the Cardinals will receive a consensus Top 10 ranking.

Below is an updated depth chart for the top position player in the Cardinals system for each respective position.  Due to length, I’ve broken it down into two parts, the second of which will be posted tomorrow.  For each player, a breakdown of their skills is included in addition to other information and statistics that I found interesting in their stance with the big club and their current league.

Pitcher

Shelby Miller: Shelby Miller is one of the consensus top prospects in minor league baseball and is the crown jewel of a system that has seen its pitching talent gain substantial depth.  The Cardinals were lauded when they chose Miller with their first-round pick in the 2009 draft after he dropped due to signing demands.  The flame-throwing righty impressed in his full-season debut at Quad Cities by eliciting superb command out of high school.  His stock rose from there as he displayed a high 12.08 K/9 ratio and dominated hitters in the Midwest League.

Miller started off this season in Palm Beach and continued to display impeccable numbers by overwhelming Florida State League hitters with a mid-90’s fastball that has shown good movement.  In just 9 starts, the Cardinals promoted Miller to AA Springfield in an aggressive move to put him on a more even level with his competition.  While posting solid numbers and maintaining a good BB%, Miller has seen his strikeout numbers drop noticeably by nearly 13% since his promotion.  Miller had become increasingly reliant on his fastball and less so on his curveball (reports recently showed that he threw it as few as 5 times during a start).  The coaching staff made it a point to stress mixing in both his curve and changeup before his last two starts in an attempt to allow him to refine the pitches to where he’d be more comfortable throwing them on a consistent basis. That conversation led to Miller giving up just 1 hit over 6 innings, despite walking 3 batters.

One thing for certain is that Miller will have to start mixing in his secondary offerings more often if he wants to maintain success as he graduates to the majors.  Despite a 2.66 ERA between Palm Beach and Springfield, he won’t be able to consistently overpower major-league hitters by throwing 90% fastballs during a start.  Because of that fact, he may be slightly further away to the majors than some here would like to think, but there’s no reason he can’t be a viable part of the rotation by the beginning of 2013 at the latest.

Catcher

Bryan Anderson: Bryan Anderson exploded on the scene after being drafted in the fourth round of the 2004 Draft.  After a solid debut in Johnson City, Anderson went on to post impressive numbers in his first full season as a professional hitter at Quad Cities.  His wRC+ of 127 was 2nd among full-time catchers who posted 300+ at-bats in the Midwest League and ranked 19th overall for position players.  He also displayed good patience with a BB% just under 10% in 2006 and has roughly maintained that number throughout his career.  He reached AAA at age 21, which didn’t temper expectations.

Whatever doubts that were aroused early on in Anderson’s career stemmed from questions about his ability to effectively remain behind the plate defensively as he climbed through the system.  None of those doubts were exactly answered, as reports came back shaky at best about slight improvements in his defense.  Red flags also began to rise when Tony La Russa passed him up for several promotions when opportunities arose to join the major league club.  La Russa has been very reluctant in the past at having a back-up catcher who doesn’t project a defense prowess behind the plate.

Anderson has failed to improve enough offensively in his minor league career to indicate that he’d make it as a regular starter in the major leagues.  Since getting his first taste in the Pacific Coast League in 2008, he has failed to produce a wRC+ that surpassed league average.  This season, Anderson ranks in the bottom half of catchers who have at least 250 plate appearances in offensive production.  A line of .281/.356/.409 is certainly nothing to scoff at as a starting catcher, but with a bad reputation defensively and showing no real improvement on the offensive side of things, Anderson has the ceiling of a back-up in the majors and will most likely only reach that goal with another club.

First Base

Matt Adams: Let’s get the basic stats out of the way.  Matt Adams is leading the Texas League in slugging percentage for batters who qualify with at least 300 at-bats.  Adams is also showing the most raw power with an ISO of .291, which is 20 points above the 2nd place power hitter.  He’s sitting 6th in the Texas League with a batting average of .322, which has dipped a bit in the past month and a half.  Good luck isn’t factoring too much into his batting average, as a .340 BABIP is somewhat sustainable with his line drive rate and home run power.  If there’s one knock against him this year it’s that his BB% is a bit low for a power hitting first baseman at 8.3%, but he’s hitting so well that it hasn’t hurt his value.  He also isn’t striking out at an erroneously high rate, which helps to indicate that his bat projects well in the future.

Adams is a big bodied first baseman who burst into view with an impressive showing between Johnson City and Batavia after getting drafted in the 23rd-round of the 2009 Draft.  He understandably didn’t receive a lot of attention initially because of the fact that he’s a first baseman and was only producing in short-season ball.  However, he has started to get national attention this season, most notably from ESPN’s Keith Law who has stated that he believes in his bat and may make his Top 100 Prospect list for next season.

Matt’s future with the Cardinals depends almost solely on what happens with Albert Pujols.  If they re-sign Pujols that means Adams is a valuable trade chip to add another piece to the major league club.  If Pujols leaves via free agency, Adams is the heir apparent who has an ETA of sometime in 2013, assuming the Cardinals don’t use the money and go after a guy like Prince Fielder.  If they value Adams highly, I would assume that they would take on a short-term guy for a year at first (ala Berkman) and then allow Adams to transition into that role when he’s ready.

From all indications, Adams has 25+ home run potential with the ability to hit for a high average and become a solid-regular first baseman.

Second Base

Kolten Wong: The Cardinals selection of Kolten Wong in this year’s draft was both jeered and heralded.  His detractors didn’t see a plus tool in his arsenal and wondered why the Cardinals took him as high as they did with their first pick.  His supporters saw a plus bat with average-to-solid-average tools across the board.

One thing that Wong has made clear in his debut is that his bat plays.  Wong ranks 3rd in wRC+ for starting second baseman with at least 150 at-bats.  It’s a sample size and initial stats in A-ball should be taken with a grain of salt, but the biggest positive is that he’s gotten off to a hot start directly out of college.  The second most positive item to look at is that he’s striking out at just a 9.9% clip (his current rate would give him 55 strikeouts in 500 at-bats), and while his 8.8% BB% isn’t anything more than average, it’s good enough to show that he’d maintain a solid OBP sitting at the top of the order.  His slash line of .327/.385/.497 would look very shiny climbing up through the system and would allow the Cardinals to finally have an offensive-minded second baseman who projects to remain at that position.

Let’s get one thing straight, however, Wong will have to rely on his bat to rise through the system.  While hardly a liability at second base, he isn’t a defensive wizard.  He doesn’t display above average speed and his SB:CS ratio of 5-to-5 indicates that he still has a bit to learn running the bases.  Wong doesn’t project to have a plus tool outside of his bat, and he’ll have to prove that he has that capability rising through the system to quiet his main detractors.  There are plenty of reasons so far to be optimistic, and the Cardinals would benefit greatly going forward in finally developing the middle infield talent that this team has lacked for quite some time.

Please note that all statistics were compiled on August 10th.

34 Responses to “Updated Positional Depth Chart Part 1”
  1. Andrew says:

    Good list, not sure Anderson is the top of our minors depth chart at catcher. I don’t think there is a clear cut favorite I may even feel that Castillo, Stanley and Perez have a better shot at being Major League catchers than Anderson. That said the Catcher I’m most excited about is Luis Perez.

    • Pierce says:

      Catcher is the hardest position for me to define in the Cardinals system. I picked Anderson, because he’s proven the most that he can hit well enough for a catcher at each different level. I think he can catch on (no pun intended) and have a decent career as a backup for a major league club, but you could easily make a case for Perez, Stanley, or even Castro being at the top of the list.

      • zuke354 says:

        Anderson will probably not be a backup. Most teams want a defensive oriented back up catcher.

        Not much value in a singles spraying back up catcher that isn’t a great glove.

      • cariocacardinal says:

        Was Cruz considered ineligible? You do realize he will be prospect eligible via BA criteria 50 games/134 AB’s after the season. He may not seem like a prospect but he still is one.

        • Pierce says:

          I meant Cruz, instead of Castro. Though looking at it again, I find it hard to believe that someone would consider him our top catching prospect.

          • cariocacardinal says:

            Looks like Tony/Mo do – at least above Anderson.

          • bc says:

            Why the last statement? I find it hard to believe it’d be someone other than Cruz at this point. Cruz has a a better wOBAr than Anderson at AAA – the primary difference between Anderson and Cruz has been BABIP. Perez’ offense has been abominable this year; he has a 2% walk rate. Stock has played the best at A+ – maybe he’s the best prospect, actually. Stanley has had a middling offensive year at QC with about a .310OBP; he’ll be 23 at the end of this year, a year older than Stock. Cruz had much better numbers at QC than Stanley at a younger age. There are others, like Geoff Klein, who is hitting better than Stanley at QC, but is a bit older. I don’t know much about his defense but it’d be hard to make a case someone like that in Low A is a better prospect than Cruz, who is only 1.5 years older (and Cruz hit as well or better in Low A as a 20y/o). There are some interesting guys at GCL and lower but they’re so far away, and have little pedigree, it’s hard to get excited yet.

            • Pierce says:

              That statement was mostly me being facetious. Anderson has had better sustained success in the upper levels offensively than Cruz. I don’t think either guy is going to have an extended career in the majors, but Anderson’s “offensive potential” may give him a longer look than Cruz. I also wasn’t blown away by Cruz’s defense.

              The fact is that the Cardinals don’t have a catching prospect who sticks out, and Anderson has been the only prospect to show some sort of aptitude offensively at an upper level for a sustained amount of time and at a reasonable age to assume that he might be able to have a few years in the major leagues.

              • bc says:

                Fair enough. We’ll have to disagree about Anderson’s “sustained success” offensively at the upper levels. Looks more like sustained mediocrity. Last year, he appeared to be taking a step forward, but it’s looking more like a fluky (minor) power spike now. At this point, I don’t see that Anderson has more “potential” than Cruz; if anything, it’s the opposite since Anderson has plateaued and Cruz has yet to stall out in the same fashion that Anderson has.

                I haven’t see enough of Cruz’ or Anderson’s defense to make a judgment; the few times I’ve seen them play I haven’t been overly impressd with either of them.

              • cariocacardinal says:

                All things being even, I think Cruz sticks longer in the majors due to his versatility.

              • zuke354 says:

                Agree with that. I can buy a temporary promotion of Pags over Anderson becasue of the glove (didn’t see enough to know if it was that great).

                However, Cruz has not really been anything all that special defensively.

    • Is it too late to make Stavinoha into a back-up catcher?

  2. cariocacardinal says:

    PLEEEAASE define what you are trying to do with the list to avoid a lot of wasted argument. Do you mean next in line? do you mean best prospect at that position? (Even best prospect can be tricky – most likely to make the majors or most likely to be an above average player there?) Some combination of best prospect and closest to the majors?

    For me a depth chart is who is next in line at that position – not sure that is what you are saying.

  3. IllinoisCardinalFan says:

    Interesting reading. I think Cario is right about defining the list. I assumed it was best prospect at their position. Although like Andrew I do not think that Anderson quite fits that equation.

  4. Pierce says:

    “top position player in the Cardinals system for each respective position” = best prospect with the most likely chance of making an impact in the majors.

  5. Lou Schuler says:

    Pierce, this is what you get for spending a lot of time on one article!

    I like what you have so far, although I wish I knew more about the catchers coming up from the LA pipeline. Audrey Perez has hit at every level, but I don’t know how his defensive tools rate. Same with Luis Perez (really impressive #s in the DSL and GCL) and Juan Castillo.

    But here’s my actual quibble: Since “pitcher” is really 12 positions — 5 starters, a closer, a couple of late-inning firemen, 2 LOOGYs a 6th starter/long reliever, and some guy La Russa loves for reasons no one else can figure out — why list just our top starter?

    I say that three-quarters in jest; it’s impossible to figure out who’ll fill those 7 bullpen roles until La Russa and Duncan decide someone is ready for one of them. But why not go 5 deep on starters?

    Everyone’s list would start with Miller and Martinez. But who’s #3? Jenkins? (So good, but so far away …) Kelly? Rosenthal? Cleto? Swagerty? Gast? Whiting?

    If there were a bullpen list, I’d put Swagerty on top, if I had any confidence that he’ll end up there. Kopp’s emergence makes it more interesting.

    • bc says:

      Unfortunately, Audry Perez sure hasn’t hit at Springfield. He’s got an 87 wOBA+ and a .291 OBP (both of which are terrible). His walk rate is 2%. That belongs on a milk carton, not a stat line. There’s a good argument to be made that Audry Perez has been the worst hitter in SPR all year. Nick Derba is probably the only guy who has been worse out of those with at least 100 PAs.

  6. Pierce says:

    The main reason I didn’t include more than 1 pitcher is that I’m thinking of expanding on the list to go a little deeper on the depth chart. Miller and Martinez are pretty much synonymous at this point, despite Martinez being in high-A.

  7. rj says:

    Castro is long gone (i think you meant castillo) and anderson was drafted in 2005 not 04. anderson has hit very well since getting more playing time and i would like to see them keep him and cruz next year because cruz can also play other positions. keep in mind that a. perez is playing 3 levels higher than last year. he was doing very well earlier at palm beach. probably was advanced too quickly.

  8. Mike G says:

    Tilson signed!

  9. Andrew says:

    I’m suprised that he got almost as much as Wong.

  10. CJ says:

    sweeet tilson signed wasn’t sure about that one. thats great

  11. Pierce says:

    Gotta love having Tilson signed. I was expecting more along $1.1 million if he did end up signing, but I love it.

  12. Mr.STL says:

    Cruz sucks at hitting and would probably hit under .200 at the ML level. IMO this whole defensive catching thing is a joke… the person actual calling the game in DD & TLR… the catcher just puts the fingers down and goes with what the game plan was…

  13. Owen says:

    Calling the game may be a bit overrated for catchers but throwing out runners and blocking balls in the dirt or catching fly-away fastballs is all catcher defense. How many runs has Yadi saved this year that an average catcher would not? I know the running game is not as big as it used to be for most clubs but he’s saved a lot of runs in scoring position and therefore plenty of subsequent runs as well. I know using probably the best defensive catcher as an example is a bit much but catchers have a whole of impact beyond handling pitchers, which is still a mighty big job at that.

    • zuke354 says:

      A good defensive catcher is hard to measure.

      Here is how I know if I have a good catcher. It’s 0-2, 2 outs and the winning run is on third. How much faith do I have in throwing in a curveball, or am I scared that it might bounce away making me change the pitch/location.

  14. Jimmyjoe says:

    Always fun to analyze. Thanks for taking the time, Hawkeye (Pierce).

  15.  
Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>