<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Redbirds 2012 Top 20: #15-#11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom s.</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57648</link>
		<dc:creator>tom s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i seem to recall seeing someone compute team-wide &quot;GPA&#039;s&quot; based on their top 20&#039;s from minor league ball. i thought that was an interesting and intuitive way to break down the systems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i seem to recall seeing someone compute team-wide &#8220;GPA&#8217;s&#8221; based on their top 20&#8242;s from minor league ball. i thought that was an interesting and intuitive way to break down the systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wileyvet</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57580</link>
		<dc:creator>wileyvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a little shocked at your ranking of Jordan Swagerty after the tremendous year he had while rocketing up through 3 levels.  I definitely have him in my top ten as do the other 6 prospect rankings I have seen so far.  To each his own I guess.  Keep up the great work otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little shocked at your ranking of Jordan Swagerty after the tremendous year he had while rocketing up through 3 levels.  I definitely have him in my top ten as do the other 6 prospect rankings I have seen so far.  To each his own I guess.  Keep up the great work otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattybobo</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57562</link>
		<dc:creator>mattybobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should have realized that Minor League Ball would be a good place to look for some sort of objective grading. Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have realized that Minor League Ball would be a good place to look for some sort of objective grading. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattybobo</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57561</link>
		<dc:creator>mattybobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, a future article perhaps?

It really would be something if we could credibly say that this year&#039;s 11-20 is as good or better than a previous year&#039;s 1-10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, a future article perhaps?</p>
<p>It really would be something if we could credibly say that this year&#8217;s 11-20 is as good or better than a previous year&#8217;s 1-10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCHIII</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57556</link>
		<dc:creator>RCHIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent visual of the improvement in the system!

Well done!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent visual of the improvement in the system!</p>
<p>Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azruavatar</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57555</link>
		<dc:creator>azruavatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[noted]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuke354</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57552</link>
		<dc:creator>zuke354</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good point.

Minor league ball gives each player a grade. All put together by sickels.

2012... 13 As and Bs.
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/10/19/2502022/st-louis-cardinals-top-20-prospects-for-2012

2011...9
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2010/12/13/1874041/st-louis-cardinals-top-20-prospects-for-2011

2010..7
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/12/12/1198166/st-louis-cardinals-top-20

2009...6
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/1/5/709221/st-louis-cardinals-top-20]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point.</p>
<p>Minor league ball gives each player a grade. All put together by sickels.</p>
<p>2012&#8230; 13 As and Bs.<br />
<a href="http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/10/19/2502022/st-louis-cardinals-top-20-prospects-for-2012" rel="nofollow">http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/10/19/2502022/st-louis-cardinals-top-20-prospects-for-2012</a></p>
<p>2011&#8230;9<br />
<a href="http://www.minorleagueball.com/2010/12/13/1874041/st-louis-cardinals-top-20-prospects-for-2011" rel="nofollow">http://www.minorleagueball.com/2010/12/13/1874041/st-louis-cardinals-top-20-prospects-for-2011</a></p>
<p>2010..7<br />
<a href="http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/12/12/1198166/st-louis-cardinals-top-20" rel="nofollow">http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/12/12/1198166/st-louis-cardinals-top-20</a></p>
<p>2009&#8230;6<br />
<a href="http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/1/5/709221/st-louis-cardinals-top-20" rel="nofollow">http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/1/5/709221/st-louis-cardinals-top-20</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCHIII</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57549</link>
		<dc:creator>RCHIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think you will find anyone to take issue with your assumption.  The future is bright - especially on the pitching front which will allow the organization to package some solid trades in the future as deemed necessary (to strengthen shortstop maybe?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you will find anyone to take issue with your assumption.  The future is bright &#8211; especially on the pitching front which will allow the organization to package some solid trades in the future as deemed necessary (to strengthen shortstop maybe?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattybobo</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57548</link>
		<dc:creator>mattybobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be fun to see a direct comparison to a list from one of the really lean years. I&#039;m not versed enough in the Cardinals&#039; farm history to make such a comparison though. I also assume the system is stronger right now than it has been in quite a long time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be fun to see a direct comparison to a list from one of the really lean years. I&#8217;m not versed enough in the Cardinals&#8217; farm history to make such a comparison though. I also assume the system is stronger right now than it has been in quite a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuke354</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/01/10/future-redbirds-2012-top-20-15-11/comment-page-1/#comment-57546</link>
		<dc:creator>zuke354</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=8502#comment-57546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madson just signed with the reds. I can only see the cards going after a closer type.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madson just signed with the reds. I can only see the cards going after a closer type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
