With the 2012 MLB draft less than a week away, it is time to take a closer look at another player that has been mocked the Cardinals direction.  In his latest mock draft, Jim Callis of Baseball America has the Cardinals selecting Richie Shaffer – 3B – Clemson with the 19th selection.  (He has the Cardinals taking high school arm Lucas Sims at 23, who was have looked at previously.)  Let’s take a look at Shaffer after the jump.

Richie Shaffer looks to be an advanced college bat in a draft that is pretty devoid of any advanced college bats minus himself.  He’s also got the “Cape Cod League alert” on him as he hit 6 HRs and 22 RBIs in 36 games on the Cape, which was enough to earn himself a spot on the Cape Cod League All Star team.  The Cardinals have in the past drafted a lot of early hitters that have performed well in the Cape Cod League with wooden bats.  Results seem to be mixed about Shaffer’s ability to stay at 3rd base.  He certainly needs some work to stay there, but some have him transitioning over to first and others think he can play right field because of his strong throwing arm.

Baseball Prospect Nation:

One of the better power prospects in the draft. Really impressive middle-of-the-order power potential. Needs to stay at third base to maintain significant prospect value. Becomes more of “just a guy” if a first baseman. Doesn’t have the elite hitting and power ability to project as an everyday first baseman at the big league level. Could be an All-Star at third base on the back of his bat alone. Defense will need some work and that will decide how quickly he develops. Advanced approach at the plate should ease transition to pro ball and allow power to play quickly. Hard worker with enough raw skill to be an impact player long term. If you believe the third base defense will come, then he’s a potential difference maker.

Project Prospect:

Elite college hitters tend to be the safest bets on draft day, unfortunately the 2012 Draft has one of the weakest crops in recent memory. Don’t blame Richie Shaffer, he’s done his part. The Tigers’ third baseman is currently hitting .339/.479/.583 with as much offensive upside as any hitter in the draft.

Shaffer’s strikeout rate is borderline for a college slugger (17.1%), but I feel that stems from his approach more so than being a significant mechanical issue. He gets pitched around some in the Clemson lineup and feels the need to try and hit the ball 600 feet whenever men are on base. Whenever Shaffer doesn’t try to do too much and focuses on line-drives up the middle it’s baseball porn. Hips and hands, balance, bat speed…I could go on, but I’ll just say it’s all there.

From MLB.com:

“Shaffer was a pretty good high school prospect a few years ago, but a hand injury and his college commitment contributed to a slide to the 25th round and he headed to Clemson.
Three years later, Shaffer is one of the more intriguing college bats in this Draft class. While there are holes to his swing, his bat is his best tool. He has plus power and can hit the ball out to all fields. He’s played both infield corners, showing off a plus arm from third, but his range might be better suited for first. He’s not a bad athlete and his power bat and arm might profile well for right field.
Shaffer is always going to have some swing and miss to his game. But his ability to be a power-hitting run producer will make many teams interested in living with the strikeouts.”

Here’s MLB.com’s draft video:

Here’s the Baseball America Draft Video and two at-bats against fellow potential 1st rounder in Marcus Stroman of Duke:

Here’s Shaffer hitting in the Cape Cod League for a few at bats:

22 Responses to “2012 Draft: Richie Shaffer”
  1. Grant says:

    Power bats are such a precious commodity. I think Shaffer would be a solid pick in the first round.

  2. zuke354 says:

    Seems to be a good balance of solid hitting and power.

  3. Wachto says:

    Klaw has his mock 2.0 posted on ESPN Insider (http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/draft/2012/story/_/id/7982412/mark-appel-goes-no-1-houston-astros-mock-draft-20-mlb).

    Here are his selections for the Cards:

    #19 St. Louis Cardinals
    Stryker Trahan, C, Acadiana H.S. (Lafayette, La.)

    I think they take Stratton if he gets here. Have heard them on every premium high school bat — including Dahl, Davis, Cecchini and Addison Russell — as well as Piscotty and Hensley. Trahan, who had a poor spring, could be a bargain here since he has a real chance to hit, and with power. (This is the compensation pick the Cardinals got from the Angels for Albert Pujols.)

    #23 St. Louis Cardinals
    Hunter Virant, LHP, Camarillo (Calif.) H.S.

    At 6-3 and 172, Virant is very projectable, and looks like the kind of guy who could really add some velocity in pro ball. Rahier is also a possibility here, as well as the names I listed at No. 19.

    FWIW: He has Shaffer going #11 to the A’s.

    • Wachto says:

      For those of you that don’t know the names he lists they are (and the place he has them):

      Chris Stratton, RHP, Mississippi State (#15)
      David Dahl, CF, Oak Mountain H.S. (Birmingham, Ala.) (#12)
      D.J. Davis, OF, Stone County (Miss.) H.S. (#22)
      Gavin Cecchini, SS, Barbe, H.S. (Lake Charles, La.) (#17)
      Addison Russell (Not in current Mock)
      Stephen Piscotty, 3B, Stanford (#25) (He had him to the Cards @ #23 in Mock 1.0)
      Ty Hensley, RHP, Edmond (Okla.) Santa Fe H.S. (#18)

      Tanner Rahier, Palm Desert (Calif.) H.S. (#21)

      • Jeff says:

        Thanks Wachto. I’ll write-up Rahier, Hensley and Stratton for tomorrow as Law didn’t mention them two weeks ago.

          • Karmaloop says:

            I would love to get Virant at 36, but I think we’d have to get him at 23 if we wanted him. Love the kid a LOT. Only just now started to pitch, so he’s still raw. Good mechanics, fastball sits in the low 90s, and he’s got a good curve. One of my favorite prospects in the draft.

            • BigRob says:

              If I didn’t know better, reading what you just posted sounds something similar to what Tyrell Jenkins’ pre-draft report may have read.

              • Karmaloop says:

                He’s a lefty version of Jenkins to an extent. Highly athletic and needs a lot of time, but the upside is there. Maybe Ted Lilly in his prime.

                • BigRob says:

                  Not bad at all. I would love to get his arm in this system but, like you said, it appears he’d have to go at 23 because he will most likely be gone by 36.

  4. Gruntosaurus says:

    He wouldn’t be a bad pick, but I don’t see star potential here. On the basis of VERY limited observation, I’d be concerned about him having to move to first — he didn’t look to have the cat-quickness you want to see from a third baseman (think Rolen).

  5. Travis F, says:

    I am a little confused by Baseball Prosectus analysis. At one point rhey say impressive middle of the order power and then they say “just aguy” at first without elite hit/power prospects at first. I understand first basemen need big power to stand out as a prospect, but to suggest he has “impressive middlie of the order power potential” would seem to suggest he can hit for significant power no matter the position. Am I wrong here?

    • Karmaloop says:

      His bat is largely dependent on where he plays. If you’d compare his number projections among first baseman, he’d be a middle of the pack bat. Think like Adam LaRoche right now. He’s not a great hitting first baseman, just an average one. At third, his bat is more like David Freese. Biggest difference is that third baseman aren’t supposed to hit as well as first baseman, hence if the bats are the same you’d prefer him at third. I’m not convinced he sticks at third, so I would rathe rthe Cardinals not take him.

  6. zuke354 says:

    If the cards got Strahan and Shaffer/Piscotty, I would be happy with that.

  7. JC says:

    I’m much higher on Shaffer than Piscotty but neither are on my short list for the Cards. I wouldn’t be too upset if they got Shaffer though if they get one of my other more attrative choices with the other 1st Rdr. Just worrisome that you have a guy that might not stick and 3rd and no concensus that he can handle a corner OF position if he has to move. If he goes to 1B that would not be a pick that would look very good at all because I don’t see his bat projecting as a bat that puts him above avg or better in the league as a 1B.

    • zuke354 says:

      Its always been my beleif that if you hit, they can fins a spot for you.

      I am also factoring history into the equation. The cards have shown an ability to draft and develop these types of hitters (carp,craig).

      • JC says:

        I agree…but if you have guys that have defensive value that you also feel will be a solid hitter than no need to take that chance on a 1st Rd pick. Not sure why you say Carp was not a good defensive player at TCU. He played a pretty good 3B in college…and I think he still plays a good 3B. With where our farm system is I want us to get aggressive with upside early in the draft and then snag some college arms and bats to give a little more balance.

        • zuke354 says:

          I put carp in there because it shows that if you can hit, they will find a spot for you.

          And I am not saying only focus on the college guys early. Who knows what will be available.

    • Karmaloop says:

      I’d really rather not take either. Right now, my ideal draft scenario would be to take two of D.J. David/David Dahl/Addison Russell/Hunter Virant in the first round, and then come back in the supplemental first with three of Walker Weickel/Clint Coulter/Josh Elander/Wyatt Mathisen/Ty Buttrey/Matt Smoral.

  8. Shanky says:

    Shaffer does seem to fit the Cards profile. . .advanced college bat, success on the Cape. But the rest of the college hitters. . .blech. At least in the first round. Personally I’d go h.s. bats at both 19 and 23, and hope one pans out in a big way. A Trahan/C. Seager combo, for example, would excite me.

  9.  
Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>