<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscar Taveras &#8211; At VEB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/</link>
	<description>Baseball&#039;s Future in the Gateway City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gruntosaurus</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82635</link>
		<dc:creator>Gruntosaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 23:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been a VEB regular for a long time (under a different handle) and enjoy the atmosphere, even though it&#039;s less -- I guess I&#039;d say &quot;contemplative&quot; than here.  However, I must say that the new SBN shell brings my fairly modern computer to its knees once individual threads get beyond a certain size.  I don&#039;t like that shell at all, and AZ, while I acknowledge your desire to streamline the mechanics of the site, I wish this move had waited until all the SBN bugs are worked out.  Oh, well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a VEB regular for a long time (under a different handle) and enjoy the atmosphere, even though it&#8217;s less &#8212; I guess I&#8217;d say &#8220;contemplative&#8221; than here.  However, I must say that the new SBN shell brings my fairly modern computer to its knees once individual threads get beyond a certain size.  I don&#8217;t like that shell at all, and AZ, while I acknowledge your desire to streamline the mechanics of the site, I wish this move had waited until all the SBN bugs are worked out.  Oh, well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82633</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 23:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll stay over also.  Would like Andrew again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll stay over also.  Would like Andrew again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gossard56</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82631</link>
		<dc:creator>gossard56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said.  And i agree completely.  The VEB discussion isn&#039;t nearly as enjoyable as FR with most of it just inside joking and goofyness.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.  And i agree completely.  The VEB discussion isn&#8217;t nearly as enjoyable as FR with most of it just inside joking and goofyness.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azruavatar</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82621</link>
		<dc:creator>azruavatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re live.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wachto</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82618</link>
		<dc:creator>Wachto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please activate me.  Wachto

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please activate me.  Wachto</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forsch31</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82616</link>
		<dc:creator>Forsch31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Future Redbirds was simply becoming a separate SBN blog, then I would have no worries. But there&#039;s very little distinguishing FR posts from VEB posts, and the commenting environment is vastly different from here, and it has little to do with tangents and meanderings.

I&#039;ve discussed prospects before with the VEB crowd, back when they used to do fanpost voting on prospects. It&#039;s not fun, and it&#039;s nothing that rules will change, because it&#039;s more attitude and interaction than anything to do with content. That&#039;s why I came here in the first place. And that&#039;s the part that sucks.

I understand your need to change it, and it is better than closing down the blog altogether. And I hope it continues, because the articles really are the point of all this. But I&#039;ve seen this show before in the same place (the other day I mentioned other blogs being absorbed--they were Capitals blogs absorbed by Japers Rink, the Capitals SBN blog). The commenting enviroment is what it is because of the people in it, and enforcing a different set of commenting rules for the same blog is extremely difficult. Japers Rink has a &quot;hockey discussion only&quot; rule in its threads, and even after 5 years on SBN, they still have to be draconian with it. And that&#039;s why I&#039;m worried. Having two separate, vibrant online Cardinals fan communities was a good thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Future Redbirds was simply becoming a separate SBN blog, then I would have no worries. But there&#8217;s very little distinguishing FR posts from VEB posts, and the commenting environment is vastly different from here, and it has little to do with tangents and meanderings.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve discussed prospects before with the VEB crowd, back when they used to do fanpost voting on prospects. It&#8217;s not fun, and it&#8217;s nothing that rules will change, because it&#8217;s more attitude and interaction than anything to do with content. That&#8217;s why I came here in the first place. And that&#8217;s the part that sucks.</p>
<p>I understand your need to change it, and it is better than closing down the blog altogether. And I hope it continues, because the articles really are the point of all this. But I&#8217;ve seen this show before in the same place (the other day I mentioned other blogs being absorbed&#8211;they were Capitals blogs absorbed by Japers Rink, the Capitals SBN blog). The commenting enviroment is what it is because of the people in it, and enforcing a different set of commenting rules for the same blog is extremely difficult. Japers Rink has a &#8220;hockey discussion only&#8221; rule in its threads, and even after 5 years on SBN, they still have to be draconian with it. And that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m worried. Having two separate, vibrant online Cardinals fan communities was a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azruavatar</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82613</link>
		<dc:creator>azruavatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Done]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuke354</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82590</link>
		<dc:creator>zuke354</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 03:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like my account activated. zuke354.

Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like my account activated. zuke354.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dixie_flyer</title>
		<link>http://www.futureredbirds.net/2012/10/08/oscar-taveras-at-veb/comment-page-1/#comment-82580</link>
		<dc:creator>dixie_flyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureredbirds.net/?p=10281#comment-82580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OT was #2 on John Sickel&#039;s preliminary top 50 hitters list for 2013. Kolten Wong was #26.

As for his preliminary top 50 pitchers list, the Cardinals were well-represented: Shelby Miller #4; Carlos Martinez #10; Trevor Rosenthal #21; and Michael Wacha #50

Links are below.

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/10/8/3474442/preliminary-top-50-hitting-prospects-for-2013

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/10/8/3474586/preliminary-top-50-pitching-prospects-list-for-2013]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT was #2 on John Sickel&#8217;s preliminary top 50 hitters list for 2013. Kolten Wong was #26.</p>
<p>As for his preliminary top 50 pitchers list, the Cardinals were well-represented: Shelby Miller #4; Carlos Martinez #10; Trevor Rosenthal #21; and Michael Wacha #50</p>
<p>Links are below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/10/8/3474442/preliminary-top-50-hitting-prospects-for-2013" rel="nofollow">http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/10/8/3474442/preliminary-top-50-hitting-prospects-for-2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/10/8/3474586/preliminary-top-50-pitching-prospects-list-for-2013" rel="nofollow">http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/10/8/3474586/preliminary-top-50-pitching-prospects-list-for-2013</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
