Archive for the “Mitch Boggs” Category

Mitch Boggs, yes, our Mitch Boggs struck out 9 batters in 6 innings pitched the other night against the unflappable Natina!s. LaRussa called his outing “fantastic” and it looks like for the time being Boggs has cemented his role as the Cardinals’ 5th starter.

We all wondered where this “wipeout slider” of Boggs went last year, having read this scouting report from Baseball America:

Boggs still can reach the mid-90s with his four-seam fastball, but his low-90s two-seamer with sink and bore is his ticket to quicker innings. He has ditched his curveball and developed a wipeout slider that ranks as one of the best in the system. Few Cardinals pitching prospects have been as consistent or durable.

That wipeout slider seemed to go AWOL when he was called up previously, and we know aside from a game or two, Boggs was less than stellar in his debut. I compiled all of Boggs starts and came up with this movement graph —
boggsmovement08

(Forgive me if the legends don’t match, I made the other graph about a month ago).

The other night?

boggsmove430

That is a good slider. The average slider moves 2.2 inches, horizontally and vertically. Unless Washington’s Pitch F/X cameras are totally wacky, Boggs’ slider is generating 5-11 inches of vertical movement at a given time. That is pretty fantastic. I’d have to investigate more if it is a case of a wonky camera in DC, but Boggs got 8 swinging strikes in 27 sliders thrown. (30%), so I’d like to think what we see is what we’re getting. Pitch f/x confused many of his sliders last year as a curveballs, but what we are seeing different from last year to this (at least for one start) is less downward break. The slider is less slurvy. Those other sliders you are seeing that have more “rise”  and less vertical movement on his first graph are misclassified as well. That would be his cutter.

Looking at this graph, we can also judge Boggs’ sinker. An average one has about 7.6 inches of horizontal break and 4.7 inches of vertical “rise”. Knowing that, we can differentiate his four-seamer from his two-seamer. The two-seamer is the red blobs more on the left and it has about average movement.

As for Boggs’ changeup, it’s definitely a “straight” change. Very little horizontal movement at all. Usually the pitch breaks in on a right-hander more. Considering how much he throws the sinker and how little movement he gets on his change, I wonder if the pitch isn’t easily picked up.

One more thing I found interesting is that Boggs’ throws his slider from a higher arm angle release point than the rest of his pitches.

boggsrelease

I don’t know if the .5-1 inch difference would be detectable by hitters or not, but it is sort of interesting.

The season is very young, but Boggs has a strikeout rate of 9 per inning with a K/BB ratio of 3.75. Whodathunk? With an improved slider and a simplified repertoire, Boggs is looking better than ever. 90-95 MPH heat, decent sink, great slider and fringy change. Not a bad arsenal for a starter.  He’s always been a mystery as to how few bats he misses, but that is changing so far this year:

SwStr%
08 Mem 7.80%
08 STL 4.90%
09 Mem 12.80%
09 STL 11.60%

It’s also worth mentioning 4/5ths of his K’s have been swinging strikeouts. We’ll see if he can keep this up, but I’d say I’m more enthused about Boggs’ than ever before.

Comments 14 Comments »

Things you never want to read.

Mitchell Boggs, the righthanded starter vying for a spot on the Cardinals’ depth chart as their No. 6 starter, has experienced tightness in his right shoulder during early bullpen sessions. Boggs will be evaluated by team doctors today as part of the pre-spring physicals, but management acknowledged that Boggs has felt some discomfort that has merited mention on the initial medical reports presented to the front office Friday.

Updated 3:19PM. Update on Boggs from Leach, things may not be as bad as initially feared:

Mitchell Boggs got some good news about his tight right shoulder. The tentative plan is to rest him for a few days, let the anti-inflammatory medication take effect and re-evaluate him early next week, but we were told that the concern level is lower than it was yesterday.

Comments 14 Comments »

A meandering conversation ensues about the ranking of Jess Todd and Mitchell Boggs, their past, their future and the state of starting pitching in the Cardinals’ farm system.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments 34 Comments »

Prior to the season I took a look at the workloads of several Cardinals prospects in relation to the Verducci Rule.  The basic premise of the Verducci Rule is that pitchers who increase their workload by more than 30 innings from one season to the next have a heightened risk of injury.  Will Carroll has found that the Verducci Rule does not exactly translate for minor league innings, but I used it as a conservative baseline for the number of innings I thought would be appropriate for the Cardinals prospects.  After the jump I’ll take a look back at the workloads for those same pitchers and how it compared to the numbers discussed prior to the season. Read the rest of this entry »

Comments 10 Comments »

Despite a down year at the plate, BA whole heartedly named Colby Rasmus the top prospect of the Pacific Coast League, ahead of Chase Headley, Max Scherzer, Brandon Wood and Carlos Gonzalez. It’s their faith in his tools that supersede the numbers and judge that’s it’s only a matter of time for Colby.

Chris Perez ranked the 12th best prospect in the league and is the top relief prospect. Bryan Anderson ranked between Nate Schierholtz and Franklin Morales, and was the second catcher to make the top twenty after the M’s Jeff Clement. They praise his game calling skills for someone of his youth, and they note his improvement in controlling the running game. They also like his speed (for a catcher) and hope he still may yet add some power.

Jaime Garcia and Mitch Boggs ranked 16th and 17th, respectively. Someone needs to update BA with the fact that Jaime went under the knife for Tommy John surgery, as they project him to be in the 2009 rotation. Scouts are high on Boggs’ pitching acumen and competitiveness, but question his ability to stick as a starter without at least an change up.

What excites me the most is in BA’s top twenties for the TL and PCL, nine of fourty made the cut. I’d rather have some players ready to make some big league impact then to have our best prospects in the lower minors. Now it’s up to the coaching to recognize their talents and properly employee them in the right spots.

Comments 7 Comments »

The pitching was more impressive than the hitting in Memphis. I got a chance to watch several relievers (Motte, Scherer, Worrell) as well as a couple starters (Walters, Boggs) that could play roles in the future for the big league club. I also saw my two nemeses far too often.

It’s boring out here.

They don’t blow enough games in late innings at Memphis.

They’re still learning to be major leaguers. We’ve got it down already.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments 10 Comments »

There are a multitude of reasons why pitching prospects don’t pan out.  I believe that, after talent, the biggest reason is health.  Every organization has had its share of pitching prospects that have flamed out, or at least have had their career temporarily derailed, due to injury and the Cardinals are no exception. 

There is no absolute connection between workload and injury – certain “rubber armed” pitchers seem to be able to throw endlessly without injury (Livan Hernandez comes to mind), but there is enough of a connection that teams are paying much closer attention to pitch counts than they used to, especially with younger pitchers.  The depth of the Cardinals system, at least according to most prospect lists, lies in our pitching prospects.  The question then, is what has their workload been thus far, and what would be ideal for 2008?  I’m going to take a look at five of the Cardinals top starting pitching prospects after the jump.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments 11 Comments »